The Bounce That Bit Back
A hard landing, a bounced recovery, and the decision to go around — or press on — in a high-performance Cessna 182
The scenario
Departing Brooksville–Tampa Bay Regional Airport (KBKV), Brooksville, FL — Runway 09, a 7,001 ft concrete runway aligned 090° true. Elevation 76 ft MSL. You are a commercial pilot with a high-performance endorsement, roughly 800 hours total, current in the Cessna 182 Skylane. Today is a local VFR flight — a practice approach and landing to stay sharp.
Conditions: OAT 32°C, dew point 24°C, altimeter 29.88. Density altitude approximately 2,100 ft — higher than field elevation, but manageable for a 182. Light winds, 5 kt from the northeast. Visibility 10 SM. KBKV tower is open (0700–2200 local); you are in Class D airspace. Smooth air, no turbulence.
Aircraft: Cessna 182 Skylane, solo, 2,500 lb gross weight, within CG limits. Continental O-470 carbureted engine, constant-speed prop, cowl flaps, steam panel, fixed gear. The airplane came out of maintenance three days ago — a 100-hour inspection and an elevator trim system rigging adjustment. You performed a preflight this morning; nothing was written up. The airplane is airworthy.
You are on a 3 nm final approach to Runway 09, descending through 800 ft AGL at 80 KIAS. The runway is made. You are stable, on glide slope, and planning a normal landing. Flaps are at 20°. Prop is set to high RPM (2,000 RPM), cowl flaps are open for cooling. You are configured for a normal approach.
- {'label': 'Field', 'value': 'KBKV · Brooksville–Tampa Bay'}
- {'label': 'Runways', 'value': '3/21 · 9/27'}
- {'label': 'Elevation', 'value': '76 ft'}
- {'label': 'Aircraft', 'value': 'C182'}
- {'label': 'Dominant phase', 'value': 'Landing / Cruise'}
The decision
Before we get into the decision tree — what do you already know about landing the C182 and recovering from a bounced landing? (Pick all that apply; this records your baseline.)
What the record shows
What the NTSB files show
NTSB ERA21LA113 (2021): A Cessna 182 on a personal flight experienced a hard landing and runway excursion when the pilot failed to properly recover from a bounced landing. The pilot attempted to salvage the landing after the bounce instead of executing a go-around. The result was a second hard landing, nose gear separation, and a nose-over. The pilot survived, but the airplane was destroyed. The probable cause was the pilot's improper recovery from the bounced landing.
NTSB WPR20CA269 (2020): A Cessna 182 landed hard more than halfway down the runway, bounced, and the pilot delayed the go-around decision until insufficient runway remained. The airplane departed the runway and collided with trees. The probable cause was the pilot's decision to continue an unstable approach and delayed go-around decision.
NTSB ERA26LA009 (2025): A Cessna 182H made a hard landing on the nose gear after the pilot, while holding the jump door closed, attempted to add elevator trim for the landing flare. Post-accident investigation revealed that maintenance personnel had improperly rigged the elevator trim system, and neither the maintenance personnel nor the pilot performed adequate post-maintenance or preflight inspections that would have detected the defect. The probable cause was improper rigging of the elevator trim system by maintenance personnel.
The common thread: hard landings in the C182 are often the result of a delayed or improper flare, a bounce that is not immediately addressed with a go-around, or a maintenance defect that affects control authority. The C182 is nose-heavy and carries more energy than a 172 — a shallow flare or a delayed go-around decision can result in a catastrophic nose gear failure.
All three real accidents cited above occurred at other airports and in other aircraft or variants — NOT at KBKV. Brooksville–Tampa Bay Regional Airport has its own accident history (see field dominant patterns), but these specific events happened elsewhere. The scenario is localized to KBKV to make the runway environment and the field's dominant hard-landing pattern real and consequential for you as a student here.
The critical lesson: in the C182, a go-around is not a failure — it is airmanship. If the approach is unstable, if the flare is not responding normally, or if the airplane bounces, execute a go-around immediately. The runway is 7,001 ft long — there is always room to go around and try again.
Key lesson — In the Cessna 182, hard landings and nose gear failures result from delayed flare decisions, bounced recoveries that are not immediately addressed with a go-around, or maintenance defects that affect control authority. The C182 is nose-heavy and carries more energy than a 172. A firm landing can result in nose gear damage. A bounce that is not immediately addressed with a go-around can result in nose gear separation and a nose-over. After maintenance, a thorough preflight and a test flight are essential — elevator trim rigging defects can hide until the landing flare, when they become catastrophic. At KBKV, Runway 09 is 7,001 ft long — there is always room to go around and try again.
Debrief — teaching points
The C182 is nose-heavy and carries more energy than a 172 — the flare is critical.
The Cessna 182 Skylane is a high-performance airplane: 230 hp Continental O-470, constant-speed prop, cowl flaps, and a heavier airframe than the 172. It carries more energy on approach and descent. A shallow or delayed flare will result in a hard touchdown and a bounce. The flare must be smooth and deliberate — pitch up gently to slow the descent rate, touch down at 60 KIAS (Vref for short-field approach), and let the main gear touch first. If the nose is still high at 50 ft AGL, you are not flaring enough. If the flare feels sluggish or the nose is not coming up as expected, go around immediately — do not press on and try to salvage an unstable landing.
A bounce after touchdown is a signal to go around — not to salvage the landing.
If the airplane bounces after touchdown — main gear leaves the runway, nose pitches down, airplane is airborne again at 50 ft AGL — the correct response is to go around immediately. Apply full throttle, pitch up to Vy (80 KIAS), and retract flaps to 0° as you climb. Do NOT try to add full flaps and reduce power to salvage the landing. A bounced recovery that is not addressed with a go-around will result in a second hard landing, nose gear damage, or nose gear separation. At KBKV, Runway 09 is 7,001 ft long — there is always room to go around and try again. The go-around is not a failure; it is airmanship.
Elevator trim rigging defects can hide until the landing flare — then they become catastrophic.
After maintenance, a thorough preflight and a test flight are essential. Elevator trim rigging defects — improper rigging by maintenance personnel — can result in a loss of control authority during the landing flare. If the elevator feels sluggish or the nose is not responding to back pressure as expected, go around immediately. Do not attempt to salvage the landing by adding more back pressure. NTSB ERA26LA009 documents a C182H hard landing that resulted from improper elevator trim rigging by maintenance personnel. The defect was not detected in the preflight or post-maintenance inspection. The pilot discovered it during the landing flare, when it was too late to recover safely.
The C182's constant-speed prop requires active RPM management — prop control is separate from throttle.
The C182's constant-speed prop is a high-performance system that requires active management. Prop control is separate from throttle. During approach, set the prop to high RPM (2,000 RPM) to maintain engine cooling and control authority. During the go-around, advance the throttle fully and ensure the prop is at high RPM for maximum power. Do not neglect prop management — a low-RPM setting during a go-around will reduce available power and climb performance.
Density altitude erodes the C182's climb performance — plan for it.
At KBKV, with an OAT of 32°C and field elevation of 76 ft MSL, density altitude is approximately 2,100 ft. This reduces the C182's climb performance. If you execute a go-around from a hard landing at 50 ft AGL, the climb rate will be reduced compared to sea-level performance. Plan for a shallow climb and ensure you have adequate runway length to execute the go-around safely. At KBKV, Runway 09 is 7,001 ft long — sufficient for a go-around, but do not delay the decision.
Built from the real accident record
Scenario built from NTSB ERA21LA113 (2021 C182 hard landing / nose-wheel separation after bounced recovery), WPR20CA269 (2020 C182 hard landing / delayed go-around / runway excursion), and ERA26LA009 (2025 C182H hard landing / elevator trim rigging defect). Anonymized and localized to KBKV.
NTSB reports: ERA21LA113 · WPR20CA269 · ERA26LA009
ACS tasks: PA.II.J — Approach and Landing · PA.II.K — Go-Around / Rejected Landing · PA.I.H — Human Factors · PA.II.B — Engine Starting / Systems Preflight · PA.IX.C — Emergency Approach and Landing
Relevant FARs: §91.3 · §91.13 · §61.31
Step through the full decision tree, make the calls, and see where each choice leads — then debrief it with your CFI.
Open the interactive scenario →All sample scenarios · More Cessna 182 Skylane scenarios · More scenarios at KBKV