FlightEdge
Sample scenario-based training
SAMPLE SBTLanding / Approach

The Turn to Final — Energy Management at 500 Feet

Base-to-final stall/spin in the SR22: recognizing the stall break, maintaining airspeed in the turn, and the limits of recovery at pattern altitude

Cirrus SR22 · Lakeland Linder International Airport (KLAL) · Private · Landing / Approach

The scenario

Departing Lakeland Linder International Airport (KLAL), Lakeland, FL — Runway 10, a full-stop landing after a local flight. Elevation 142 ft MSL. The field is towered (Class D, ceiling 2,600 ft MSL), active, and you are cleared to land.

It is a clear, calm afternoon: OAT 24°C, wind 080° at 4 knots, visibility 10 SM. The pattern is light — one other aircraft on downwind. You are on a 4-mile final approach to Runway 10, descending through 1,200 ft AGL, airspeed 95 KIAS, power set for a normal descent. The runway is in sight.

You request a left base turn from tower. Tower clears you to turn base. You roll into the left turn, reducing power slightly and adding 20° of flaps. The turn is smooth. You are at 600 ft AGL, airspeed 88 KIAS, descending at 300 fpm. The runway is ahead and to the left.

As you roll out of the base turn and begin the turn to final, you notice the airspeed has decayed to 82 KIAS — below your target approach speed of 88 KIAS (best glide in the SR22). The nose is slightly high. You are concentrating on the runway alignment and have not yet added power to arrest the descent. You are at 500 ft AGL.

Aircraft: Cirrus SR22, solo, within weight and balance limits. Fuel is full. The constant-speed propeller is set to high RPM (2,400), mixture is leaned for the altitude, and the glass Perspective panel is functioning normally. Nothing was written up; the airplane is airworthy.

Pilot: you — a Private pilot, current, roughly 180 hours total. You have 35 hours in the SR22. This is your home field. You have flown this pattern 50+ times. You are not instrument-rated. You are not fatigued, but you are thinking ahead to the landing — where to touch down on the runway, how to manage the float, whether to use full flaps or 50%.

The decision

Before we get into the decision tree — what do you know about stall/spin accidents in the pattern, and the SR22's stall characteristics? (Pick all that apply; this records your baseline.)

What the record shows

What the NTSB files show

NTSB WPR20FA019 (2019, FATAL): A Cirrus SR22 on a personal flight stalled during landing approach while maneuvering in the traffic pattern at low airspeed. The pilot exceeded the critical angle of attack while maneuvering for landing, resulting in an aerodynamic stall and loss of control. The airplane impacted a residential area. The probable cause was the pilot's exceedance of the airplane's critical angle of attack while maneuvering for landing.

NTSB ERA23FA258 (2023, FATAL): A Cirrus SR22T experienced an engine manifold air pressure exceedance during initial climb after a touch-and-go landing. The pilots lost control of the aircraft and deployed the ballistic recovery parachute at an altitude too low for effective deployment. The accident resulted from the pilots' failure to maintain aircraft control following the anomalous engine indication. The CAPS deployment at low altitude was ineffective.

The local environment at KLAL makes base-to-final stalls particularly consequential: Runway 10's climb-out environment (heading 090°) is marginal — low-density development, open developed areas (parks/large lots), and dense development. A stall/spin on the Runway 10 departure would likely result in impact with structures or terrain. However, the base-to-final turn — the scenario here — occurs over the approach environment, which is similar: low-density development and open areas. At 500 ft AGL, recovery from a spin is marginal at best. KLAL's own accident corpus shows LOSS_OF_CONTROL_INFLIGHT at 23.7% — the dominant pattern at this field.

NTSB FTW91DRG06 (1991, FATAL): A Questair Venture experimental aircraft stalled during a base-to-final turn on a maintenance test flight. The pilot failed to maintain flying airspeed during the approach. The airplane impacted terrain.

NTSB SEA07CA125 (2007): A Cessna 170B stalled during the base-to-final turn when the pilot allowed airspeed to become too low. The pilot attempted recovery but the aircraft impacted a field adjacent to the airport.

NTSB CHI89DET01 (1988, FATAL): A Volksplane VP-1 stalled while turning downwind at approximately 300 ft AGL with a nose-high attitude and slow airspeed. The airplane entered an incipient spin and struck the ground in an inverted attitude.

NTSB ERA10CA300 (2010): A Piper PA-18-135 stalled and entered a spin during a climbing right turn on final approach when the pilot attempted to perform a 360-degree turn per ATC spacing request. The pilot failed to maintain adequate airspeed during the climbing turn.

The consistent thread across all these events: base-to-final stalls occur when pilots allow airspeed to decay below safe margins while maneuvering in a turn at low altitude. The turn tightens, the nose rises, and the pilot is focused on runway alignment rather than airspeed. At 500 ft AGL, there is no altitude for recovery. The SR22's stall speed in a 20° bank is approximately 75–77 KIAS — very close to the approach speed of 88 KIAS. A 10-knot decay is the difference between a stable approach and a stall break. The real accidents cited above occurred at other airports and in other aircraft — NOT at KLAL. However, KLAL's own accident pattern (LOSS_OF_CONTROL_INFLIGHT 23.7%) shows that this field has seen its share of control-loss accidents. The scenario is localized to KLAL to make the pattern environment and the altitude real for you as a student here.

The lesson is simple and unforgiving: maintain airspeed in the pattern. At 500 ft AGL on the turn to final, every knot matters. The stall warning is your last alert — by the time it sounds, you are seconds from the stall break. The correct response to a stall approach is immediate nose-down pitch and full power. If you cannot recover by 300 ft AGL, you do not have enough altitude to recover. CAPS is a last-resort system — it is not a recovery tool for stalls in the pattern.

Key lesson — Base-to-final stalls in the SR22 are the result of airspeed decay in a turn at low altitude. The stall speed in a 20° bank is 75–77 KIAS — very close to the approach speed of 88 KIAS. Maintain airspeed, monitor the descent rate, and add power to arrest any decay. At 500 ft AGL, there is no margin for error. If the stall warning sounds, lower the nose immediately and add full power. If you cannot recover by 300 ft AGL, you do not have enough altitude to recover.

Debrief — teaching points

Stall speed increases significantly in a banked turn.

The SR22's stall speed clean is 70 KIAS; stall speed in landing configuration (full flaps) is 59 KIAS. However, in a 15° bank, the stall speed increases by approximately 5%; in a 20° bank, it increases by approximately 10%. A 20° bank during the base-to-final turn can push the stall speed to 75–77 KIAS — very close to the approach speed of 88 KIAS. A 10-knot decay in airspeed is the difference between a stable approach and a stall break. Monitor the airspeed indicator continuously during the turn, and maintain a margin of at least 10 knots above the stall speed for the bank angle in use.

The stall warning is your last alert — not your first.

The SR22 has an aural stall warning that activates 5–10 knots above the stall break. By the time the stall warning sounds, you are seconds from the stall break. The correct response is immediate nose-down pitch and full power. However, the better approach is to avoid the stall warning entirely by maintaining airspeed and descent rate during the approach. Scan the airspeed indicator as part of your regular instrument scan, especially during turns in the pattern.

Nose-high attitude is a stall precursor — especially at low altitude.

A nose-high attitude combined with low airspeed and a turn is a classic stall setup. In the pattern, the nose should be level or slightly nose-down during the descent. If you notice the nose is high and airspeed is decaying, add power immediately to lower the nose and increase airspeed. Do not attempt to 'stretch' the glide by holding a nose-high attitude — this is the path to a stall.

Complacency and distraction are the enemies in the pattern.

Base-to-final stalls often occur on familiar approaches at home fields, where pilots are comfortable and less vigilant. The scenario here — you have flown this pattern 50+ times — is a classic setup for complacency. You are thinking ahead to the landing (where to touch down, how to manage the float) rather than focusing on the immediate task: maintaining airspeed and descent rate. In the pattern, especially during turns, your focus must be on the instruments and the airplane's energy state. Runway alignment comes second.

CAPS is a last-resort system — not a recovery tool for stalls in the pattern.

The SR22's ballistic recovery parachute (CAPS) is the POH's primary response to an unrecoverable spin or loss of control without a safe landing option. However, CAPS is designed for deployment at higher altitudes — the POH recommends at least 1,000 ft AGL for effective deployment. At 350 ft AGL, CAPS deployment is marginal at best. The descent rate under CAPS is 1,200+ fpm, and at this altitude, the impact is hard. The correct response to a stall approach in the pattern is immediate nose-down pitch and full power — not CAPS. If you cannot recover by 300 ft AGL, you do not have enough altitude to recover.

Recovery from a stall requires immediate, correct action.

Stall recovery in the SR22 requires immediate nose-down pitch and full power. The nose must be lowered to break the stall — this increases airspeed and regains lift. Power must be added to arrest the descent and provide energy for the recovery. At 500 ft AGL in the pattern, there is no time for hesitation or incorrect action. The margin between a stall approach and a stall break is measured in seconds. If the stall warning sounds, lower the nose and add full power immediately. If you cannot recover by 300 ft AGL, you do not have enough altitude to recover.

Built from the real accident record

Scenario built from NTSB WPR20FA019 (2019 SR22 stall during landing approach), ERA23FA258 (2023 SR22 loss of control following engine anomaly), and local base-to-final stall precedents FTW91DRG06, SEA07CA125, CHI89DET01, ERA10CA300. Anonymized and localized to KLAL.

NTSB reports: ERA23FA258 · CEN20LA379 · CEN20LA336 · WPR20FA019 · FTW91DRG06 · SEA07CA125 · CHI89DET01 · ERA10CA300

ACS tasks: PA.VIII.A — Preflight Inspection · PA.VIII.B — Engine Starting · PA.VIII.C — Taxiing · PA.VIII.D — Takeoff and Climb · PA.VIII.E — Approach and Landing · PA.IX.C — Emergency Approach and Landing · PA.I.H — Human Factors

Relevant FARs: §91.3 · §91.13 · §91.21

Run this scenario yourself

Step through the full decision tree, make the calls, and see where each choice leads — then debrief it with your CFI.

Open the interactive scenario →

All sample scenarios · More Cirrus SR22 scenarios · More scenarios at KLAL