Engine Failure on Initial Climb
Total power loss at 400 ft AGL after a touch-and-go at Lakeland Linder — the decision window is seconds, the off-field environment is real
The scenario
Departing Lakeland Linder International Airport (KLAL), Lakeland, FL — Runway 10, touch-and-go landing as part of an instructional cross-country flight. Elevation 142 ft MSL. You are a Private pilot with roughly 180 hours total time; your CFI is in the right seat.
It is a clear, calm morning: OAT 22°C, altimeter 29.98, visibility 10+ SM. Light wind from the northeast. The runway is 8,500 ft long — plenty of room. You land smoothly, touch down at midfield, and begin the touch-and-go roll: power to full throttle, flaps to 0°, trim for climb. The CFI is monitoring.
At 400 ft AGL, climbing at 79 KIAS (Vy, best rate of climb), heading 090°, the engine suddenly loses all power. The propeller is still turning (windmilling), but there is no thrust. You have roughly 30 seconds of useful glide time before you must land. The runway is behind you. Ahead and to the right (east) is low-density development, wooded wetland, and open developed areas (parks, large lots) — the off-field environment off Runway 10's departure end. To the left (north) is medium development and pasture. Behind you is the airport.
Aircraft: Cessna 172R, solo + CFI, within limits. Lycoming IO-360-L2A fuel-injected engine, 160 hp. Fixed gear, fixed-pitch prop, steam panel with vacuum-driven instruments. Nothing was written up; the airplane was airworthy at departure. The engine ran smoothly through the landing and the initial climb.
Pilot: you — a Private pilot, current, roughly 180 hours total. You have never experienced a total engine failure in flight. Your CFI is in the right seat and will not take the controls unless you ask or the situation becomes unrecoverable. The decision is yours.
- {'label': 'Field', 'value': 'KLAL · Lakeland Linder'}
- {'label': 'Runways', 'value': '5/23 · 10/28'}
- {'label': 'Elevation', 'value': '142 ft'}
- {'label': 'Aircraft', 'value': 'C172R'}
- {'label': 'Dominant phase', 'value': 'Landing / Takeoff'}
The decision
Before we get into the decision tree — what do you already know about engine failure on initial climb in the C172R? (Pick all that apply; this records your baseline.)
What the record shows
What the NTSB files show
NTSB CEN14LA333 (2014): A Cessna 172R on an instructional cross-country flight experienced partial loss of engine power during initial climb after a touch-and-go landing at an airport in the Southeast. The pilot made a forced landing short of the runway. The probable cause was partial loss of engine power for reasons that could not be determined — a postaccident engine examination and operational test run revealed no anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. The engine failure was not repeatable; the cause remains unknown.
NTSB ANC18LA013 (2017): A Cessna 172R on a personal flight from Carroll County Airport experienced total engine power loss shortly after takeoff during initial climb. The pilot made a forced landing to a field. The probable cause was total loss of engine power for reasons that could not be determined — a postaccident engine examination and testing revealed no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. Like CEN14LA333, the failure was not repeatable.
NTSB WPR18LA039 (2017): A Cessna 172R experienced total engine power loss due to crankshaft fatigue fracture during climb. The instructor performed a forced landing to a field past the runway and impacted a fence. The probable cause was fatigue separation of the crankshaft due to a fatigue fracture. This is a mechanical failure — the crankshaft broke in flight, resulting in total loss of power.
NTSB ERA14LA142 (2014): A Cessna 172R experienced rapid oil pressure loss during climb, returned to the departure airport, and lost all engine power during an ILS approach, resulting in a forced landing on a highway. The probable cause was total loss of engine power due to maintenance personnel's improper installation of the lower vacuum pump. This is a maintenance error — the vacuum pump was installed incorrectly, leading to oil starvation and engine failure.
The real accidents cited above occurred at other airports and in other aircraft types — NOT at Lakeland Linder International Airport (KLAL). KLAL has its own accident history (see field dominant patterns: LOSS_OF_CONTROL_INFLIGHT 23.7%, LOSS_OF_CONTROL_GROUND 19.4%, FORCED_LANDING 17.2%), but these specific NTSB cases happened elsewhere. The scenario is localized to KLAL to make the off-field environment real and consequential for you as a student here.
The consistent thread across all these events: engine failure on initial climb in the C172R is survivable if you recognize it immediately and lower the nose to best glide (65 KIAS). The decision window is 10–15 seconds. Delay, troubleshooting, or attempting a desperate turn back to the runway at too low an altitude results in a crash landing. The pilots in CEN14LA333 and ANC18LA013 made forced landings and survived; the pilot in WPR18LA039 impacted a fence; the pilot in ERA14LA142 landed on a highway. All survived because they recognized the failure and got the airplane on the ground. The engine failure itself is not the killer — the delay is.
Key lesson — Engine failure on initial climb in the C172R is a total-power-loss emergency. The decision window is 10–15 seconds. Lower the nose to 65 KIAS best glide immediately — this is the priority. Assess your landing options: return to the runway if altitude permits, or land in the nearest suitable off-field area. Off Runway 10's departure end at KLAL, the off-field environment is low-density development, wooded wetland, and open developed areas (parks, large lots) — suitable for a forced landing. Troubleshooting, delay, or a desperate turn at too low an altitude results in a crash landing. Recognize the failure, fly the airplane, and land it.
Debrief — teaching points
Engine failure on initial climb is a total-power-loss emergency.
In the C172R, total engine failure can occur for reasons that may never be determined (as in CEN14LA333 and ANC18LA013) or for mechanical causes like crankshaft fatigue (WPR18LA039) or maintenance errors (ERA14LA142). The common factor is that the failure is sudden and complete. There is no time for troubleshooting. The first action is to lower the nose to best glide (65 KIAS) and assess your landing options. Delay or troubleshooting burns altitude you cannot afford to lose.
Best glide speed in the C172R is 65 KIAS — establish it immediately.
At 400 ft AGL with a total engine failure, you have roughly 30–40 seconds of glide time. Best glide speed (65 KIAS) maximizes your glide distance and gives you the most time and distance to find a landing surface. Lowering the nose to 65 KIAS is the first action — before troubleshooting, before declaring an emergency, before assessing landing options. The airplane must be flown first.
Returning to the departure runway is often possible if altitude permits.
If you recognize the engine failure immediately and lower the nose to best glide, you often have enough altitude to turn back to the runway you just departed from. At 400 ft AGL, a shallow turn back to the runway is feasible. At 250 ft AGL, it is marginal. At 150 ft AGL, it is not possible. The key is recognizing the failure early and lowering the nose immediately — do not waste altitude troubleshooting or in a steep turn.
Off Runway 10's departure end at KLAL, the off-field environment is suitable for a forced landing.
The off-field environment off Runway 10's departure end (heading 090°) is low-density development, wooded wetland, and open developed areas (parks, large lots). This is a MARGINAL to GOOD off-field environment — not open water, not dense urban development. If you cannot return to the runway, a forced landing in an open area or park in this environment is survivable. Aim for the largest open area you can see; avoid wooded areas and dense development.
The C172R has a fuel-injected Lycoming IO-360 — no carburetor heat.
The C172R's fuel-injected engine has no carburetor and no carburetor heat. Engine roughness or failure is diagnosed via mixture, boost pump, fuel selector, and fuel contamination — not carb ice. In this scenario, the engine failure is total and sudden; there is no time for troubleshooting. In other scenarios, a rough engine might be addressed by checking the fuel selector (BOTH) or the boost pump (ON). But on initial climb with a total power loss, troubleshooting is not the priority — flying the airplane is.
The C172R has a steam / vacuum panel — a vacuum failure is a partial-panel emergency, not an engine failure.
The C172R's panel is vacuum-driven steam gauges (attitude indicator, heading indicator, vertical speed indicator). A vacuum system failure (like the improper vacuum pump installation in ERA14LA142) causes a partial-panel emergency — you lose vacuum-driven instruments but the engine is not affected. A total engine failure is different: the engine loses power, the propeller windmills, and you have no thrust. Know the difference: vacuum failure = partial panel; engine failure = no power.
Built from the real accident record
Scenario built from NTSB CEN14LA333 (2014 C172R partial power loss on initial climb after touch-and-go), ANC18LA013 (2017 C172R total power loss shortly after takeoff), WPR18LA039 (2017 C172R crankshaft fatigue fracture during climb, forced landing to field), and ERA14LA142 (2014 C172R rapid oil pressure loss during climb, forced landing on highway). Localized to KLAL.
NTSB reports: CEN14LA333 · ANC18LA013 · WPR18LA039 · ERA14LA142
ACS tasks: PA.I.F — Weather Information · PA.I.G — Cross-Country Flight Planning · PA.IX.C — Emergency Approach and Landing · PA.I.H — Human Factors · PA.II.B — Engine Starting / Systems Preflight
Relevant FARs: §91.3 · §91.13 · §91.185
Step through the full decision tree, make the calls, and see where each choice leads — then debrief it with your CFI.
Open the interactive scenario →All sample scenarios · More Cessna 172R scenarios · More scenarios at KLAL