Long and High on Final
Excess approach energy, a tailwind component, and the decision to go around — energy management in the Cessna 172S
The scenario
Departing St. Petersburg Clearwater International Airport (KPIE), Pinellas Park, FL — Runway 18 (true heading 171°), 9,730 ft concrete. Elevation 11 ft MSL. You are on a personal VFR flight, solo, full fuel, within limits.
It is a late afternoon in early summer: OAT 29°C, altimeter 29.92, visibility 10 SM. The wind is reported from 160° at 12 knots gusting to 18 knots — a direct tailwind component on Runway 18. The tower is active (part-time 0600–2300 local); you are in Class D airspace with overlying Tampa Class B above 1,200 MSL.
You are on short final to Runway 18, 2 nm out, 1,000 ft AGL, descending at 74 KIAS (Vy, best rate of climb speed — you have not yet reduced to approach speed). The runway is in sight. You are high on the glide path and the runway is visibly long ahead of you. The wind is gusting; you feel the airplane being pushed toward the runway.
Aircraft: Cessna 172S, solo, full fuel, within limits. Lycoming IO-360-L2A fuel-injected engine, fixed-pitch prop, fixed gear, G1000 glass panel. Flaps are currently at 10°. You have not yet reduced to approach speed (Vref 65 KIAS) or added landing flaps.
Pilot: you — a Private pilot, current, roughly 250 hours total. You are familiar with KPIE from your training. You have not flown a go-around in gusting wind conditions. You did not brief the tailwind component before descent.
- {'label': 'Field', 'value': 'KPIE · St. Petersburg Clearwater'}
- {'label': 'Runways', 'value': '4/22 · 18/36'}
- {'label': 'Elevation', 'value': '11 ft'}
- {'label': 'Aircraft', 'value': 'C172S'}
- {'label': 'Dominant phase', 'value': 'Takeoff / Landing'}
The decision
Before we get into the decision tree — what do you know about approach energy management and go-arounds in the C172S? (Pick all that apply; this records your baseline.)
What the record shows
What the NTSB files show
NTSB CEN23LA159 (2023): A Cessna 172S on a personal flight experienced a tailwind on final approach. The pilot attempted a go-around when landing appeared long. During the go-around, the aircraft porpoised (bounced), the nose landing gear collapsed, and the aircraft departed the runway. The probable cause was the pilot's failure to maintain airplane control during the attempted go-around, resulting in abnormal contact with the runway pavement and a runway excursion. The tailwind component was a contributing factor.
NTSB ERA21LA202 (2021): A Cessna 172S on short final in gusting crosswind conditions was high and slow. The pilot initiated a go-around, but improper pitch control resulted in a tail strike and a runway excursion to the left into grass. The probable cause was the pilot's improper pitch control during a go-around in gusting crosswind conditions. The high-and-slow approach, combined with aggressive pitch-up in the go-around, created the conditions for loss of control.
NTSB ERA11LA421 (2011): A Cessna 172S experienced total electrical failure shortly after takeoff from Lincoln Park Airport (a different field). The pilot landed long on the runway with high airspeed and inadequate braking performance, resulting in a runway overrun and collision with a guardrail. The probable cause was the pilot's improper touchdown point, resulting in a runway overrun. The lesson: a long landing with excess airspeed on a runway of known length can result in an excursion if the pilot does not plan for the landing distance required.
At KPIE, Runway 18 is 9,730 ft long — plenty of runway for a normal landing. However, if you touch down at 4,500 ft down the runway with excess airspeed and inadequate braking, the remaining 5,200 ft may not be enough to stop before the runway ends. The off-field environment off Runway 18's departure end (heading 171°) is marginal: mostly medium development, open developed (parks/large lots), and dense development. An excursion off the end of Runway 18 is into developed terrain — not water, but not a safe landing surface either.
The real accidents cited above occurred at other airports and in other aircraft — NOT at KPIE. KPIE has its own accident history (see field dominant patterns: LOSS_OF_CONTROL_INFLIGHT 21.2%, LOSS_OF_CONTROL_GROUND 15.2%, STALL_SPIN 12.1%, GEAR_UP_LANDING 9.1%, OBSTACLE_ON_TAKEOFF_LANDING 9.1%). The scenario is localized to KPIE to make the runway length, the tailwind component, and the off-field environment real and consequential for you as a student here.
The consistent thread across all these events: a high-and-long approach with a tailwind component creates a decision point. The pilot must either (1) commit to a long landing with adequate runway remaining, or (2) execute a clean, coordinated go-around with proper pitch control and flap retraction. The failure is always in the execution: either landing too long and running out of runway, or executing an aggressive go-around that results in a stall, spin, or loss of control.
Key lesson — In the C172S, approach energy management is critical. If you are high and long on final with a tailwind component, the correct decision is often to go around rather than try to land long. A go-around is not a failure — it is airmanship. If you execute a go-around, pitch to Vx (62 KIAS best angle of climb), retract flaps incrementally, and maintain coordinated control. Aggressive pitch-up and full flap retraction in a go-around are the pathway to a stall-spin accident at low altitude. At KPIE, Runway 18 is 9,730 ft long — use it wisely.
Debrief — teaching points
Vref (approach speed) in the C172S is 65 KIAS — not Vy (74 KIAS).
Vy is the best rate of climb speed — it is used during climb-out and go-arounds. Vref is the approach speed — it is used on short final to establish a stable descent to the runway. If you are at 74 KIAS on short final, you are at climb speed, not approach speed. You are too fast, and the airplane will float. Reduce to Vref (65 KIAS) by 2 nm on final, and maintain that speed until you are ready to flare. This is a fundamental energy-management skill.
A tailwind component on final increases ground speed and runway distance required.
If the wind is 160° at 12 knots and the runway is 171°, the tailwind component is approximately 10 knots. Your ground speed on final at 65 KIAS airspeed is now 75 knots. Your landing distance increases by roughly 20–25% compared to a calm-wind landing. At KPIE, Runway 18 is 9,730 ft long — still plenty of runway — but the tailwind is a significant factor in your decision to go around or commit to a long landing. Brief the wind component before descent.
A go-around is not a failure — it is the correct decision when you are high and long.
If you are high on the glide path, long on the runway, and have a tailwind component, the correct decision is often to go around. Runway 18 at KPIE is 9,730 ft long; you can afford to go around and try again. A go-around is a normal part of flying. The NTSB CEN23LA159 pilot attempted a go-around when landing appeared long — the decision was correct. The execution (improper pitch control) was the failure, not the decision itself.
In a go-around, pitch to Vx (62 KIAS) and retract flaps incrementally — do not pitch aggressively or retract flaps all at once.
A go-around requires full power, pitch to Vx (62 KIAS best angle of climb), and flap retraction in stages (10° at a time). The airspeed must stay above Vx (62 KIAS) and well above the stall speed (48 KIAS clean). If you pitch up aggressively and retract flaps all at once, the airspeed can drop below Vx toward the stall speed. At low altitude (800–1,000 ft AGL), a stall in a go-around is fatal. Pitch smoothly, retract flaps incrementally, and maintain coordinated control. The NTSB ERA21LA202 pilot's improper pitch control during a go-around resulted in a tail strike and runway excursion. Pitch control is the critical skill.
If you are committed to landing long, plan for the landing distance and brake appropriately.
If you decide to land long on Runway 18 (9,730 ft), you still have 5,200–7,200 ft of runway remaining depending on where you touch down. That is plenty of runway to stop. Flare smoothly, touch down on the mains, apply full flaps (if not already), and brake firmly but not abruptly. Do not land on the nose gear first — that is a hard landing that can damage the nose gear. The NTSB ERA11LA421 pilot landed long with high airspeed and inadequate braking, resulting in a runway overrun. Plan the landing distance and execute the braking.
Built from the real accident record
Scenario built from NTSB CEN23LA159 (2023 C172S go-around / runway excursion), ERA21LA202 (2021 C172S go-around / tail strike / crosswind), and ERA11LA421 (2011 C172S electrical failure / long landing / runway overrun). Anonymized and localized to KPIE.
NTSB reports: CEN23LA159 · ERA21LA202 · ERA11LA421
ACS tasks: PA.II.C — Takeoff and Departure · PA.II.E — Approach and Landing · PA.II.F — Go-Around / Rejected Landing · PA.I.H — Human Factors · PA.IX.C — Emergency Approach and Landing
Relevant FARs: §91.3 · §91.13 · §91.103
Step through the full decision tree, make the calls, and see where each choice leads — then debrief it with your CFI.
Open the interactive scenario →All sample scenarios · More Cessna 172S scenarios · More scenarios at KPIE