Rough Climb Over Tampa Bay
Carburetor ice, marginal climb power, and a water-surrounded departure — the decision window is seconds
The scenario
Departing St. Petersburg Clearwater International Airport (KPIE), Pinellas Park, FL — Runway 04, climbing out on a 040° heading. Elevation 11 ft MSL; the runway is essentially at sea level. You are a Private pilot with 180 hours total time, current and proficient.
It is a hazy Florida morning in late spring: OAT 26°C, dew point 21°C, altimeter 29.94. Scattered clouds at 2,800 ft, light rain shower two miles to the northeast. Visibility 9 SM. Classic Gulf Coast conditions — warm, moist, and exactly the environment the FAA icing probability chart marks as 'serious icing at glide power, moderate icing at cruise power.' The relative humidity is 78%.
You are 350 ft AGL, climbing through 68 KIAS (Vy, best rate of climb), heading 040°, when the engine begins to run rough. Power is noticeably down — the tachometer is dropping. The water of Tampa Bay and the Gulf of Mexico fill the windscreen ahead. KPIE's tower is open (0600–2300 local) and you are in Class D airspace. You are solo, full fuel, within limits.
Aircraft: Cessna 150M, solo, full fuel, within limits. Continental O-200-A, carbureted, fixed-pitch prop, steam panel, fuel selector on BOTH. Nothing was written up; the airplane was airworthy at departure. This is a 100 hp airplane — climb performance is marginal at best, especially in warm air and at gross weight.
Pilot: you — a Private pilot, current, 180 hours total. You did not apply carburetor heat during the run-up because the engine ran smoothly. You did not apply it after takeoff because you were focused on the climb and did not anticipate icing conditions at 350 ft AGL in 26°C air.
- {'label': 'Field', 'value': 'KPIE · St. Petersburg Clearwater'}
- {'label': 'Runways', 'value': '4/22 · 18/36'}
- {'label': 'Elevation', 'value': '11 ft'}
- {'label': 'Aircraft', 'value': 'C150'}
- {'label': 'Dominant phase', 'value': 'Takeoff / Landing'}
The decision
Before we get into the decision tree — what do you already know about carburetor ice in the C150M? (Pick all that apply; this records your baseline.)
What the record shows
What the NTSB files show
NTSB ERA25LA028 (2024): A Cessna 150H encountered carburetor ice at cruise altitude in conditions with 100% relative humidity and a temperature/dew point spread conducive to serious icing. The engine ran rough and lost power. The probable cause was carburetor ice formation with the pilot's delayed use of carburetor heat.
NTSB ANC25LA005 (2024): A Cessna 150 on a personal flight experienced partial engine power loss due to carburetor ice during initial climb in conditions with 70% relative humidity conducive to serious icing at glide power. The probable cause was the pilot's improper use of carburetor heat while operating on Mogas in icing conditions.
NTSB ERA24LA087 (2024): A Cessna 150M on a solo cross-country instructional flight experienced partial engine power loss due to carburetor icing when the student pilot failed to apply carburetor heat. The accident resulted in a runway excursion during the diversionary landing.
NTSB CEN23FA077 (2023, FATAL): A Cessna 150H on an instructional flight conducted a night visual approach to a non-towered airport in dark conditions. The aircraft descended below safe altitude and impacted a farm field 1.2 miles short of the runway. The accident was attributed to loss of engine power due to carburetor icing and the flight instructor's failure to apply carburetor heat. The flight instructor's failure to maintain control after the power loss while maneuvering for a forced landing in dark night VFR conditions was the proximate cause.
The local environment at KPIE makes this scenario particularly unforgiving: Runway 04's departure end is open water — Tampa Bay and the Gulf of Mexico. An engine failure on the Runway 04 departure at low altitude is a ditching, not a field landing. There is no open field, no road, no park. The water is the off-field environment. This is not hypothetical; it is the USGS NLCD ground cover off that runway end.
The real accidents cited above occurred at other airports and in other aircraft — NOT at St. Petersburg Clearwater International Airport. KPIE has its own accident history (see field dominant patterns: LOSS_OF_CONTROL_INFLIGHT 21.2%, LOSS_OF_CONTROL_GROUND 15.2%, STALL_SPIN 12.1%), but these specific events happened elsewhere. The scenario is localized to KPIE to make the off-field environment real and consequential for you as a student here.
The consistent thread across all these events: carburetor ice in the C150 is insidious. It builds gradually, the first symptom is roughness and a dropping tachometer (not a dramatic power cut), and by the time it is obvious, it may be too late for a comfortable recovery. The fix — full carburetor heat, immediately, at the first sign of roughness in conducive conditions — is simple. The failure is always a delay. In the C150M with only 100 hp, marginal climb performance is the baseline; any power loss at low altitude over water is critical.
Key lesson — In warm, moist Gulf Coast air, the C150M's carbureted Continental O-200-A can accumulate serious carburetor ice even at cruise power and above-freezing temperatures. Apply full carburetor heat at the first sign of engine roughness or unexplained RPM loss. At low altitude over water, the decision window is measured in seconds — not minutes. Off Runway 04 at KPIE, the off-field environment is open water: a delayed response means a ditching, not a field landing. The C150M's 100 hp and marginal climb rate mean you cannot afford to lose any power.
Debrief — teaching points
Carburetor ice forms in conditions you would not expect.
The FAA icing probability chart shows 'serious icing at glide power' at temperatures between roughly 20°C and 30°C when relative humidity is high — exactly the Gulf Coast afternoon conditions at KPIE. You do not need visible ice, freezing temperatures, or IMC. Warm, moist air at reduced power is the classic carb-ice environment. The C150M's Continental O-200-A is carbureted; it has no alternate air system. Carburetor heat is the only tool. At 26°C OAT and 78% relative humidity, you are in the serious icing range at glide power.
The first symptom is subtle — a dropping tachometer and engine roughness.
In a fixed-pitch airplane like the C150M, carburetor ice first shows as engine roughness and an unexplained RPM decrease. There is no dramatic power cut. Pilots who are not actively monitoring the tachometer miss the early warning. By the time the roughness is obvious, significant ice has accumulated. Scan the tachometer as part of your regular instrument scan, especially in conducive conditions. The C150M's marginal climb rate means even a small power loss is significant.
Apply full carburetor heat — not partial — and expect an initial RPM drop.
When you apply carb heat to an iced carburetor, the RPM will drop further before it rises. This is expected and normal: the heat is melting ice and the resulting water is briefly disrupting combustion. Do not remove carb heat when the RPM drops — that is the heat working. Hold it full on. The RPM will recover as the ice clears, typically within 15–30 seconds depending on ice accumulation. Partial carb heat can worsen the situation by partially melting ice into water ingestion without fully clearing the restriction.
At KPIE Runway 04, an engine failure on departure is a ditching.
The off-field environment off Runway 04's departure end (heading 040°) is open water — Tampa Bay and the Gulf of Mexico. There is no alternate landing surface. If the engine quits on the Runway 04 departure and altitude is insufficient to return to the airport, the outcome is a ditching. This is not a worst-case scenario; it is the geographic reality. Best glide is 60 KIAS. Doors unlatched before water contact. Master off just before impact. Flaps for slowest possible touchdown speed — impact energy rises with the square of touchdown speed, so the slowest possible speed matters most. Know this before you line up on Runway 04.
The C150M has only 100 hp — marginal climb performance is the baseline.
The C150M's climb rate at gross weight in warm air may be 300–400 fpm or less. Any power loss at low altitude is critical. You cannot afford to delay the carb heat decision or to waste altitude on a full pattern when an emergency approach is available. A straight-in or modified approach to the nearest runway is the correct response to a partial-power emergency at low altitude. The C150M's light wing loading also makes it gust- and stall-sensitive on the base-to-final turn; a low-altitude bank in a rough-engine situation is risky.
Proactive carb heat use in conducive conditions is not optional.
The C150M POH and the FAA Pilot's Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge both recommend applying carburetor heat when conditions are conducive to icing — before the symptom appears. In a Gulf Coast summer departure, with OAT near 26°C and dew point near 21°C, that means applying carb heat during the run-up check (and confirming the expected RPM drop, then recovery) and considering its use during climb in visible moisture or high humidity. Waiting for the roughness to appear at 350 ft AGL over Tampa Bay is waiting too long.
Built from the real accident record
Scenario built from NTSB ERA25LA028, ANC25LA005, ERA24LA087 (C150 carburetor ice / partial power loss), WPR21LA329, CEN21LA381, ERA21LA284 (C150 delayed carb heat response), and CEN23FA401, CEN23FA077 (C150 power loss / stall spiral). Anonymized and localized to KPIE.
NTSB reports: ERA25LA028 · ANC25LA005 · ERA24LA087 · WPR21LA329 · CEN21LA381 · ERA21LA284 · CEN23FA401 · CEN23FA077
ACS tasks: PA.I.F — Weather Information · PA.I.G — Cross-Country Flight Planning · PA.IX.C — Emergency Approach and Landing · PA.I.H — Human Factors · PA.II.B — Engine Starting / Systems Preflight
Relevant FARs: §91.3 · §91.13 · §91.185
Step through the full decision tree, make the calls, and see where each choice leads — then debrief it with your CFI.
Open the interactive scenario →All sample scenarios · More Cessna 150M scenarios · More scenarios at KPIE