Total Power Loss on Runway 22 Departure
Engine failure at 400 ft AGL over open water — the ditching decision must be immediate and decisive
The scenario
Departing Sarasota Bradenton International Airport (KSRQ), Runway 22, on a VFR cross-country flight to the north. Elevation 30 ft MSL. Runway 22 is 5,006 ft of asphalt, heading 218° magnetic. You are cleared for takeoff by KSRQ tower (Class C, active 0600–0000 local).
Conditions are favorable: clear skies, visibility 10 SM, light winds from the east. OAT 26°C, altimeter 29.98. The Gulf of Mexico lies to the southwest — off Runway 22's departure end (heading 218°), the off-field environment is open water, low-density development, and parks. A forced landing off that runway end is a ditching, not a field landing.
You are in the SR22 — a high-performance, fuel-injected Continental IO-550-N, constant-speed prop, glass Perspective panel, fixed gear. Solo, full fuel (both tanks), within limits. You completed a thorough preflight; the engine ran smoothly on the ground. Oil temperature and pressure were green. Nothing was written up.
Pilot: you — a Commercial pilot, current, roughly 800 hours total, with 200 hours in type (SR22). You are familiar with KSRQ and have made this departure before. You have not flown this particular airplane in three weeks — it was in the shop for a 100-hour inspection and returned to service yesterday.
You advance the throttle, the SR22 accelerates normally, and you rotate at 60 KIAS. Positive rate — gear is fixed, nothing to raise. You are climbing at 101 KIAS (Vy, best rate of climb) on a heading of 218°. At 400 ft AGL, the engine begins to lose power. The tachometer is unwinding. Oil pressure is dropping. The engine is failing.
- {'label': 'Field', 'value': 'KSRQ · Sarasota Bradenton'}
- {'label': 'Runways', 'value': '4/22 · 14/32'}
- {'label': 'Elevation', 'value': '30 ft'}
- {'label': 'Aircraft', 'value': 'SR22'}
- {'label': 'Dominant phase', 'value': 'Takeoff / Landing'}
The decision
Before we get into the decision tree — what do you already know about engine failure on initial climb in the SR22? (Pick all that apply; this records your baseline.)
What the record shows
What the NTSB files show
NTSB ERA19TA120 (2019): A Cirrus SR22 on a cross-country flight experienced total loss of engine power due to oil pressure loss at 8,000 feet. The pilot deployed the ballistic recovery parachute (CAPS) and ditched the aircraft in the Atlantic Ocean in a controlled manner. The investigation determined that oil pressure loss led to total engine failure, but the specific cause could not be determined. The pilot's decision to deploy CAPS and execute a controlled ditching resulted in survival.
NTSB WPR15LA089 (2015): A Cirrus SR22 on a transpacific repositioning flight was unable to transfer fuel from the aft auxiliary tank to the main fuel tanks. The pilot diverted to a cruise ship and deployed the ballistic recovery parachute for a controlled ditching. The investigation could not determine the reason for the fuel transfer failure, as the airplane was ditched and not recovered.
NTSB WPR13WA197 (2013): A Cirrus SR-22 with Chinese registration experienced loss of engine power and made a controlled ditching near Zhuhai Sanzao Airport, Guangdong Province, China. The investigation is being conducted by the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC); no probable cause has been determined. The pilot executed a controlled ditching and survived.
Regional precedents show the same pattern: NTSB ATL97LA099 (1997 P210N), NYC03LA109 (2003 C175A), BFO91LA069 (1991 C177RG), and ANC13LA048 (2013 PA-16) all experienced engine failure on initial climb and executed controlled ditchings. The common thread: early recognition of the engine failure, commitment to the ditching decision when altitude is insufficient to return to the airport, and execution of the ditching procedure (best glide speed, configuration for slowest touchdown speed, smooth water approach, master off before impact, immediate evacuation).
The real accidents cited above occurred at other locations and in other aircraft — NOT at KSRQ. KSRQ has its own accident history (see field dominant patterns: LOSS_OF_CONTROL_GROUND 19.2%, FORCED_LANDING 15.4%, RUNWAY_EXCURSION 11.5%), but these specific engine-failure ditching events happened elsewhere. The scenario is localized to KSRQ Runway 22 to make the off-field environment (open water, low-density development, parks) real and consequential for you as a student here.
The consistent thread across all these events: total engine failure on initial climb, when altitude is low and the off-field environment is water, requires an immediate and decisive response. The decision window is measured in seconds — not minutes. The correct sequence is: (1) recognize the engine failure, (2) establish best glide speed (88 KIAS in the SR22), (3) evaluate whether altitude is sufficient to return to the airport, (4) if not, commit to a controlled ditching, (5) configure the airplane for slowest possible touchdown speed, (6) pick the smoothest water, (7) flare gently just before impact, (8) master off just before water contact, (9) evacuate immediately. Delays at any step increase the risk of an uncontrolled impact or loss of control.
Key lesson — At 400 ft AGL with total engine failure off Runway 22 at KSRQ, the off-field environment is open water — a ditching is the only option. The decision to ditch must be immediate and decisive. Best glide speed is 88 KIAS. Configuration for slowest possible touchdown speed (flaps 50%, doors unlatched, mixture rich) is not optional — it directly affects impact energy and survival. The SR22's ballistic recovery parachute (CAPS) is a valid emergency response, but only if you do not have time or altitude to execute a controlled ditching. In this scenario, at 400 ft AGL, you have time and altitude for a controlled ditching — that is the better choice. The NTSB data show that controlled ditchings have higher survival rates than ballistic descents under CAPS.
Debrief — teaching points
Total engine failure on initial climb is a ditching scenario if altitude is insufficient to return to the airport.
At 400 ft AGL with total engine failure, the glide distance available in the SR22 (roughly 2,000 ft at 88 KIAS best glide) is insufficient to return to KSRQ (1.2 nm = 7,200 ft behind you). The turn-back attempt is a trap — it consumes altitude and energy, and by the time you roll out on a reciprocal heading, you are below the glide path. The correct decision is to recognize the situation early, establish best glide, and commit to a controlled ditching in the water ahead. Do not attempt a turn-back at low altitude with total engine failure unless you are certain the distance is makeable.
Best glide speed in the SR22 is 88 KIAS — establish it immediately on engine failure.
The SR22's best glide speed is 88 KIAS. This is the speed that maximizes glide distance and gives you the most time to manage the emergency. Establish it immediately when you recognize engine failure. Do not climb the turn or attempt to stretch the glide — maintain 88 KIAS and focus on the descent and water approach. The SR22 is a high-performance airplane with significant energy; it will glide well at best glide speed.
Configuration for slowest possible touchdown speed is critical — flaps, doors, mixture.
Impact energy rises with the square of touchdown speed. The slowest possible water touchdown speed is the priority. In the SR22, this means: flaps to 50% (the speed-limiting flap setting is 119 KIAS at 50% flaps; you are at 88 KIAS, well below that), doors unlatched (for post-ditching egress), mixture rich (for engine restart if needed, though unlikely), fuel selector on the fuller tank. These configuration steps are not optional — they directly affect impact energy and survival. Do not skip them to save time; they take 30 seconds and they matter.
Off Runway 22 at KSRQ, the off-field environment is open water — a forced landing is a ditching.
The off-field environment off Runway 22's departure end (heading 218°) is open water (Gulf of Mexico), low-density development, and parks. There is no alternate landing surface. An engine failure on the Runway 22 departure at low altitude is a ditching, not a field landing. This is not a worst-case scenario; it is the geographic reality. Know this before you line up on Runway 22. If you are uncomfortable with a potential ditching off that runway, depart from Runway 04 or Runway 14 instead — both have better off-field options (marginal and poor, respectively, but not open water).
CAPS is a valid emergency response, but only if you do not have time or altitude for a controlled ditching.
The SR22's ballistic recovery parachute (CAPS) is designed for unrecoverable situations: spin, loss of control, structural failure. It is also a valid response to engine failure without a safe landing option. However, if you have time and altitude to execute a controlled ditching (as you do at 400 ft AGL), that is the better choice. A controlled ditching at 88 KIAS with proper configuration and flare is smoother and less violent than a ballistic descent under CAPS. The NTSB data show that controlled ditchings have higher survival rates. Deploy CAPS only if you are in a descending spiral, stalling, or otherwise losing control — not as the first response to engine failure when you have time to ditch.
Master switch off just before water contact — not early, not late.
Turn the master switch off just before water contact (roughly 50 ft AGL) to prevent electrical fires post-impact. Do not turn it off early — you need electrical power for lights, radio, and instruments during the descent. Do not wait until after impact — the electrical system may short and start a fire. The timing is critical: just before water contact, master off. This is a procedural detail that matters.
Built from the real accident record
Scenario built from NTSB ERA19TA120 (2019 SR22 total engine power loss, controlled ditching), WPR15LA089 (2015 SR22 fuel transfer failure, controlled ditching), WPR13WA197 (2013 SR22 engine failure, controlled ditching), and regional precedents ATL97LA099 (1997 P210N engine failure on climb, ditching), NYC03LA109 (2003 C175A partial power loss, ditching), BFO91LA069 (1991 C177RG engine failure at 300 ft, ditching), ANC13LA048 (2013 PA-16 engine failure at 350 ft, ditching). Real events occurred at other locations — NOT at KSRQ.
NTSB reports: ERA19TA120 · WPR15LA089 · WPR13WA197 · ATL97LA099 · NYC03LA109 · BFO91LA069 · ANC13LA048
ACS tasks: PA.I.F — Weather Information · PA.I.G — Cross-Country Flight Planning · PA.IX.C — Emergency Approach and Landing · PA.I.H — Human Factors · PA.II.B — Engine Starting / Systems Preflight · PA.VIII.A — Loss of Engine Power
Relevant FARs: §91.3 · §91.13 · §91.185
Step through the full decision tree, make the calls, and see where each choice leads — then debrief it with your CFI.
Open the interactive scenario →All sample scenarios · More Cirrus SR22 scenarios · More scenarios at KSRQ