FlightEdge
Sample scenario-based training
SAMPLE SBTTakeoff / Initial Climb

Power Loss on Initial Climb

Engine failure after touch-and-go at a Class C airport — the off-field environment dictates your landing site

Cessna 172R · Sarasota Bradenton International Airport (KSRQ) · Private · Takeoff / Initial Climb

The scenario

Departing Sarasota Bradenton International Airport (KSRQ), Runway 04, on an instructional cross-country flight. Elevation 30 ft MSL. You have just completed a touch-and-go landing on Runway 04 (heading 038°) and are climbing out on the initial departure. The tower is active (Class C, part-time 0600–0000 local). Wind is light and variable. Visibility is unrestricted. VFR conditions.

You are 400 ft AGL, climbing at 79 KIAS (Vy, best rate of climb), heading 038°, when you notice the engine is running rough. The tachometer is unwinding — RPM is dropping noticeably. You have not yet reached 500 ft AGL. The runway is behind you. Ahead and to your left (north/northeast) is medium development and wooded wetland. To your right (south/southeast) is open water and low-density development.

Aircraft: Cessna 172R, solo, full fuel, within limits. Lycoming IO-360-L2A, fuel-injected, 160 hp. Fixed-pitch prop, fixed gear, fuel selector on BOTH. The airplane was airworthy at departure; nothing was written up. The engine ran smoothly during the run-up and the touch-and-go landing.

Pilot: you — a Private pilot, current, roughly 200 hours total. You are familiar with KSRQ from training flights. The tower has cleared you for a departure climb on a heading of 038°. You have roughly 30 seconds of useful decision time before altitude becomes critical and your off-field options narrow.

The decision

Before we get into the decision tree — what do you already know about engine failure on initial climb in the C172R? (Pick all that apply; this records your baseline.)

What the record shows

What the NTSB files show

NTSB CEN14LA333 (2014): A Cessna 172R on an instructional cross-country flight experienced partial loss of engine power during initial climb after a touch-and-go landing and made a forced landing short of the runway. The probable cause was partial loss of engine power for reasons that could not be determined — a postaccident engine examination revealed no mechanical anomalies that would have precluded normal operation.

NTSB ANC18LA013 (2017): A Cessna 172R on a personal flight from Carroll County Airport experienced total engine power loss shortly after takeoff during initial climb. The probable cause was total loss of engine power for reasons that could not be determined — a postaccident engine examination and testing revealed no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures.

NTSB WPR18LA039 (2017): A Cessna 172R experienced total engine power loss due to crankshaft fatigue fracture during climb. The instructor performed a forced landing to a field past the runway. The probable cause was fatigue separation of the crankshaft due to a fatigue fracture, which resulted in total loss of engine power and a subsequent off-airport landing and impact with a fence.

NTSB ERA14LA142 (2014): A Cessna 172R experienced rapid oil pressure loss during climb, returned to the departure airport, and lost all engine power during an ILS approach, resulting in a forced landing on a highway. The probable cause was total loss of engine power due to maintenance personnel's improper installation of the lower vacuum pump.

The real accidents cited above occurred at other airports and in other aircraft — NOT at Sarasota Bradenton International Airport. KSRQ has its own accident history (see field dominant patterns: LOSS_OF_CONTROL_GROUND 19.2%, FORCED_LANDING 15.4%, RUNWAY_EXCURSION 11.5%, HARD_LANDING 11.5%, LOSS_OF_CONTROL_INFLIGHT 11.5%), but these specific NTSB events happened elsewhere. The scenario is localized to KSRQ to make the off-field environment real and consequential for you as a student here.

The consistent thread across all these events: engine failure in the C172R can happen with little warning. Some failures are mechanical (crankshaft fatigue, oil starvation), some are unexplained (no anomalies found postaccident). The common factor is that the failure occurs on initial climb, when altitude is low and options are limited. The decision to turn back to the runway, land ahead, or ditch is made in seconds — not minutes. Off Runway 04 at KSRQ, the off-field environment is marginal (medium development, wooded wetland) — a forced landing there is difficult but possible. Off Runway 22, the environment includes open water — a forced landing there is a ditching. Know your off-field environment before you depart.

Key lesson — Engine failure on initial climb in the C172R is rare but catastrophic when it happens. The decision to turn back to the runway, land ahead, or ditch must be made in seconds at 400 ft AGL. At KSRQ, Runway 04's departure environment is marginal (medium development, wooded wetland); Runway 22's is open water (ditching). Know the off-field environment off each runway end before you line up. Best glide is 65 KIAS. A straight-in approach to the runway is faster and safer than a full pattern at low altitude with a failing engine.

Debrief — teaching points

Engine failure on initial climb is rare but catastrophic — the decision window is seconds, not minutes.

The NTSB cases show that engine failure in the C172R can occur with little warning on initial climb. Some failures are mechanical (crankshaft fatigue, oil starvation), some are unexplained. The common factor is that the failure occurs at low altitude, when options are limited and the decision to turn back, land ahead, or ditch must be made in seconds. At 400 ft AGL, you have roughly 30 seconds of useful decision time. Scan the engine instruments continuously during initial climb. If oil pressure drops, oil temperature rises, or power is lost, make your landing-site decision immediately — do not delay.

The C172R is fuel-injected — if the engine is rough, check mixture and boost pump, not carb heat.

The C172R has a Lycoming IO-360-L2A fuel-injected engine. There is no carburetor and no carburetor heat. If the engine is running rough on initial climb, the first checks are mixture (lean if needed) and boost pump (confirm it is on). If the engine is still rough after these checks, scan the engine instruments for oil pressure, oil temperature, fuel pressure, and engine temperature. A rough engine with dropping oil pressure is a mechanical failure — not a fuel-system issue.

Know the off-field environment off each runway end before you depart.

At KSRQ, Runway 04's departure environment (heading 038°) is marginal — medium development and wooded wetland. A forced landing there is difficult but possible. Runway 22's departure environment (heading 218°) includes open water — a forced landing there is a ditching. Runway 14's departure environment (heading 134°) is poor — dense development. Runway 32's departure environment (heading 314°) is poor — medium development, dense development, and marsh. Before you line up on a runway, know what is ahead of you if the engine fails. This knowledge drives your landing-site decision at 400 ft AGL.

At 400 ft AGL with an engine failure, a 180° turn back to the runway is marginal — do it only if the engine partially recovers.

The 'impossible turn' debate is real. At 400 ft AGL in a C172R with a failing engine, a 180° turn back to the runway requires altitude and coordination you are marginal on. If the engine is still producing some power, the turn is doable. If the engine has failed completely, the turn may not be possible — you will lose altitude in the bank and may not make the runway. The safer option at 400 ft AGL with a complete engine failure is to land ahead in the marginal off-field environment or ditch in open water, rather than attempt a tight turn back to the runway.

Best glide is 65 KIAS — establish it immediately if power is lost.

Best glide speed for the C172R is 65 KIAS. This speed maximizes glide distance and gives the most time and distance to manage an engine failure. Establish 65 KIAS immediately if power is lost. Do not climb above it (you will lose altitude faster) or descend below it (you will also lose altitude faster). 65 KIAS is the speed to fly to the runway, to the marginal off-field landing site, or to the ditching area.

A straight-in approach to the runway is faster and safer than a full pattern at low altitude with a failing engine.

If you turn back to the runway with a failing engine at 350–400 ft AGL, do not attempt a full pattern (downwind, base, final). Advise the tower of the emergency and request a straight-in or modified approach. Fly a direct, descending approach at 65 KIAS best glide, add flaps as the runway is made, and touch down. The shortest path to the runway is the safest path when the engine is failing.

Full flaps for the slowest possible touchdown speed is the correct ditching procedure.

If you ditch in open water, use full flaps (30°) to slow the airplane to the slowest possible touchdown speed. The Vfe (maximum flap extended speed) for full 30° flaps in the C172R is 85 KIAS. Impact energy rises with the square of speed — the slowest possible touchdown speed matters most. Fuel selector BOTH, mixture rich, master off just before water contact, doors unlatched. A controlled ditching with full flaps is survivable; a high-speed ditching is not.

Built from the real accident record

Scenario built from NTSB CEN14LA333 (2014 C172R partial power loss on initial climb after touch-and-go), ANC18LA013 (2017 C172R total power loss shortly after takeoff), WPR18LA039 (2017 C172R crankshaft fatigue fracture during climb), and ERA14LA142 (2014 C172R oil pressure loss during climb). Real events occurred at other airports — NOT at KSRQ.

NTSB reports: CEN14LA333 · ANC18LA013 · WPR18LA039 · ERA14LA142

ACS tasks: PA.I.F — Weather Information · PA.I.G — Cross-Country Flight Planning · PA.IX.C — Emergency Approach and Landing · PA.I.H — Human Factors · PA.II.B — Engine Starting / Systems Preflight

Relevant FARs: §91.3 · §91.13 · §91.185

Run this scenario yourself

Step through the full decision tree, make the calls, and see where each choice leads — then debrief it with your CFI.

Open the interactive scenario →

All sample scenarios · More Cessna 172R scenarios · More scenarios at KSRQ