Drift and Departure
A gusty crosswind, a late correction, and the runway excursion that follows
The scenario
Field: Sarasota Bradenton International Airport (KSRQ), elevation 30 ft MSL. Tower has assigned Runway 04 for landing — a 5,006-ft asphalt strip. The ATIS reports winds 070° at 14 gusting 22 knots.
Aircraft: Cessna 172S, N-number your school's, two aboard (you and a passenger), fuel full, weight within limits. G1000 panel, Lycoming IO-360-L2A fuel-injected engine, fixed gear, fixed-pitch prop. Everything is normal.
Weather: VMC, scattered clouds at 2,500 ft, visibility 10 SM. The wind is the story — a right quartering crosswind on Runway 04 that is gusting 8 knots above the steady component. The C172S demonstrated crosswind component is 15 knots; the gust peak puts you right at that limit.
Pilot: you — a Private pilot with about 180 hours, current, comfortable at KSRQ. You've landed in crosswinds before, but today's gusts are at the edge of what you've practiced.
Environment: Off the Runway 04 departure end the terrain is marginal — medium development, wooded wetland, low-density development. Off the Runway 22 end is open water. There is no good off-airport option if something goes wrong on the runway; staying on the pavement is the priority.
- {'label': 'Field', 'value': 'KSRQ · Sarasota Bradenton'}
- {'label': 'Runways', 'value': '4/22 · 14/32'}
- {'label': 'Elevation', 'value': '30 ft'}
- {'label': 'Aircraft', 'value': 'C172S'}
- {'label': 'Dominant phase', 'value': 'Takeoff / Landing'}
The decision
On short final for Runway 04, before the flare — which of these is actively in your head? (Pick all that apply — no wrong answers; this records your pre-landing awareness.)
What the record shows
What the NTSB files show
Runway excursions in gusty crosswind conditions are the dominant accident pattern at KSRQ and at airports throughout the Florida Gulf Coast region. The mechanism repeats: a crosswind at or near the aircraft's demonstrated limit, a gust that breaks the approach or rollout picture, and a pilot response that is either too late, cross-controlled, or applied to the wrong control.
In NTSB CEN23LA159 (2023), a Cessna 172S on a personal flight encountered a tailwind on final, attempted a go-around when the landing looked long, and the airplane porpoised — the nose gear collapsed on abnormal runway contact and the airplane departed the runway. The probable cause was the pilot's failure to maintain control during the go-around. The go-around itself was not the error; the loss of pitch discipline during it was.
In NTSB ERA21LA202 (2021), a Cessna 172S on short final in gusting crosswind conditions was high and slow. The pilot initiated a go-around but improper pitch control caused a tail strike and a runway excursion to the left into the grass. Again: the go-around decision was correct; the execution was not.
The regional precedents (GAA17CA105, ERA17CA149, CHI02TA149) add a consistent finding: pilots who lose directional control during rollout in gusty conditions often apply the wrong corrective input — brake instead of aileron, or rudder without aileron — and the departure from the runway follows quickly. At KSRQ, the off-runway environment off Runway 04 is marginal (development and wetland); off Runway 22 is open water. There is no good off-pavement option. Staying on the runway is not optional.
These events occurred at other airports and in other aircraft — not at KSRQ. But the conditions that produced them — gusty crosswinds at the demonstrated limit, late go-around decisions, and imprecise go-around pitch control — are present at KSRQ on any afternoon sea-breeze day.
Key lesson — In a gusty crosswind at the demonstrated limit, the go-around decision must come early — before the approach is badly broken — and the go-around must be flown with disciplined pitch control. On the rollout, full upwind aileron is not optional and is not relaxed after touchdown; the wing is still flying until the airplane stops. Crosswind technique is not a landing skill — it is a rollout skill that continues until the airplane is clear of the runway.
Debrief — teaching points
The demonstrated crosswind component is a limit, not a target.
The C172S demonstrated crosswind component of 15 knots is the value at which Cessna test pilots demonstrated control during certification — it is not a guaranteed safe operating envelope for all pilots in all conditions. When the gust peak pushes the crosswind component to or beyond 15 knots, the margin for technique error approaches zero. At that point, the go-around trigger should be lower, not higher, than on a calm day. If the approach is not exactly right, leave.
Hold full upwind aileron from flare through full stop.
The crosswind does not stop trying to lift the upwind wing when the main gear touches. At 50 KIAS on rollout, the wing is still generating significant lift; a gust can still raise it. Full upwind aileron — held throughout the rollout, not relaxed after touchdown — keeps the upwind wing loaded onto the ground. This is the single most commonly omitted technique in crosswind rollout accidents. The aileron comes out of the stop only when the airplane is clear of the runway and stopped.
A go-around must be flown with pitch discipline — it is not automatic safety.
Both CEN23LA159 and ERA21LA202 involved C172S go-arounds that became accidents because of improper pitch control. In the C172S, the go-around sequence is: full throttle, establish a positive pitch attitude (approximately 10° nose-up), then retract flaps from 30° to 20° once a positive climb rate is confirmed, then to 0° as the climb is established. Pulling aggressively to arrest a sink causes a porpoise or tail strike. The go-around is a precise maneuver, not a panic response.
Gust additive on Vref: add half the gust factor.
With winds 14 gusting 22 knots, the gust factor is 8 knots. Half of that is 4 knots. Add it to Vref (65 KIAS) for a target of 69 KIAS on short final. This provides a speed buffer against the gust stealing lift at the worst moment — the flare. Do not carry the full gust additive all the way to the threshold; bleed it off in the flare. Arriving at the flare at 75 KIAS on a 5,006-ft runway is a different problem.
Decide the go-around trigger before you turn final — not in the flare.
The most dangerous moment to decide to go around is during the flare, when the airplane is slow, the runway is close, and the temptation to 'just land' is strongest. Brief the go-around criteria on downwind: 'If I am not on centerline, on speed, and in a stable slip by 200 ft AGL, I am going around.' That decision, made in advance, removes the hesitation that turns a salvageable approach into a cross-controlled excursion. At KSRQ, with development and wetland off the Runway 04 end and open water off Runway 22, the runway is the only good option — which means staying on it, not departing it in a botched recovery.
Built from the real accident record
Scenario built from NTSB CEN23LA159, ERA21LA202, ERA11LA421, and regional crosswind-excursion precedents at and near KSRQ. Anonymized and localized.
NTSB reports: CEN23LA159 · ERA21LA202 · ERA11LA421 · GAA17CA105 · ERA17CA149 · GAA16CA149 · CHI02TA149
ACS tasks: PA.IV.B — Normal and Crosswind Approach and Landing · PA.IV.N — Go-Around / Rejected Landing · PA.I.H — Human Factors · PA.IV.A — Normal Takeoff and Climb
Step through the full decision tree, make the calls, and see where each choice leads — then debrief it with your CFI.
Open the interactive scenario →All sample scenarios · More Cessna 172S scenarios · More scenarios at KSRQ