FlightEdge
Sample scenario-based training
SAMPLE SBTLanding / Takeoff

Crosswind Bounce and Drift at Peter O Knight

A gusty afternoon landing in the DA40 — directional control, energy management, and the decision to go around

Diamond DA40 · Peter O Knight Airport (KTPF) · Commercial · Landing / Takeoff

The scenario

Departing Peter O Knight Airport (KTPF), Tampa, FL — Runway 22, landing in a gusty afternoon crosswind. Elevation 8 ft MSL. You are a Commercial pilot with roughly 400 hours total time, 80 hours in the DA40, and current on type. This is a local flight — you know the field.

The weather: VFR, visibility 10 SM, scattered clouds at 3,500 ft. Wind is from 280° at 12 gusts to 18 knots. Runway 22's magnetic heading is 217°. The crosswind component is roughly 10–12 knots steady, with gusts pushing 15–16 knots. This is within the DA40's demonstrated crosswind capability (12 knots), but the gusts are at the edge. The afternoon is warm and a bit bumpy.

You are on a 4-mile final for Runway 22, descending through 800 ft AGL. The approach is stable: 70 KIAS (Vref), flaps full (landing configuration), prop full forward (2,000 RPM), mixture leaned for the field elevation. The runway is in sight. You are hand-flying; the G1000 is in navigation mode. Off Runway 22's departure end (heading 217°) is open water — Tampa Bay. Off Runway 22's approach end (heading 037°) is dense development. This is a short field (3,583 ft) in a tight urban environment.

Aircraft: Diamond DA40, fixed gear, constant-speed prop, fuel selector on RIGHT (you switched to RIGHT on descent to balance fuel). The DA40 is a slippery, energy-rich airplane — it floats in ground effect and demands active energy management on approach. Crosswind landings in the DA40 require early crosswind correction, positive rudder input, and a willingness to go around if the approach is not stable.

Pilot: you — Commercial, 400 hours, 80 hours DA40. You have landed at KTPF a dozen times. You are current and proficient. But you have not landed in gusts this strong in the DA40. You are confident, perhaps a touch overconfident.

The decision

Before we get into the decision tree — what do you know about crosswind landings in the DA40 and when to go around? (Pick all that apply.)

What the record shows

What the NTSB files show

NTSB ERA21LA039 (2020): A Diamond DA40 on a supervised solo instructional flight lost directional control during landing when the aircraft bounced and drifted left. The student pilot's attempt to abort the landing was unsuccessful, and the aircraft struck a taxiway sign and cartwheeled before impacting a security fence. The probable cause was the pilot's loss of directional control while landing, which resulted in a runway excursion. The accident occurred at a different airport, not KTPF.

NTSB GAA19CA582 (2019): A Diamond DA40 on an instructional flight experienced a loss of control during an aborted go-around when the pilot cut power and applied brakes with insufficient runway remaining. The accident resulted from the pilot's decision to abort a go-around without adequate runway distance and his failure to accurately communicate his intentions to ATC. The lesson: if you go around, commit to the go-around — do not attempt to abort it mid-climb.

NTSB GAA19CA038 (2018): A Diamond DA40 flown by a solo student pilot experienced a runway excursion and struck a taxiway sign after landing with excessive speed. The accident was attributed to the student pilot's excessive taxi speed during a turn from the runway to a taxiway. The lesson: maintain control through the entire landing rollout and taxi phase.

NTSB GAA17CA105 (2016): A Piper PA-46 experienced loss of directional control during landing rollout in gusting crosswind conditions that exceeded the aircraft's demonstrated crosswind capability. The accident resulted from the pilot's loss of directional control during the aborted landing in gusting crosswind conditions. The lesson: recognize when crosswind conditions exceed aircraft capability and commit to go-around early rather than attempting recovery during rollout.

The local environment at KTPF makes this scenario particularly consequential: Runway 22's approach end (heading 037°) is dense development — a runway excursion there could mean impact with a structure. Runway 22's departure end (heading 217°) is open water. The field is short (3,583 ft) and in a tight urban environment. Crosswind landings at KTPF demand precision and early decision-making.

The real accidents cited above occurred at other airports and in other aircraft — NOT at KTPF. The scenario is localized to KTPF to make the off-field environment real and consequential for you as a student here. KTPF's dominant accident pattern includes FORCED_LANDING (19.4%), LOSS_OF_CONTROL_INFLIGHT (16.7%), LOSS_OF_CONTROL_GROUND (11.1%), and DITCHING (11.1%) — all related to the field's tight urban environment and water surroundings.

The consistent thread across all these events: loss of directional control during landing or rollout in crosswind conditions. The DA40 is a slippery, energy-rich airplane that demands active energy management and precise control inputs. A stable approach, early crosswind correction, and maintained directional control through rollout are non-negotiable. If the approach is unstable or directional control is lost, the correct decision is to go around — not to attempt recovery on the runway.

Key lesson — In gusty crosswind conditions at KTPF, the DA40 demands early crosswind correction, a stabilized approach, and maintained directional control through rollout. The demonstrated crosswind capability is 12 knots — gusts beyond that are outside the envelope. If the approach is unstable or directional control is lost below 200 ft AGL, go around immediately. A runway excursion at KTPF could mean impact with dense development off the approach end or a ditching off the departure end. The decision to go around must come early — before the airplane drifts beyond recovery.

Debrief — teaching points

The DA40's demonstrated crosswind capability is 12 knots — gusts beyond that are outside the envelope.

The DA40 POH specifies a demonstrated crosswind capability of 12 knots. This is the maximum crosswind component the airplane has been tested and certified for. Gusts that exceed this capability (e.g., 12 kt steady + 6 kt gust = 18 kt peak) are outside the tested envelope. At KTPF, with wind 280° at 12 gusts 18 kt on Runway 22, the peak crosswind is at the edge of or beyond capability. Recognize this limit and be prepared to go around or divert if conditions exceed it.

Crosswind correction must be applied early and maintained through touchdown.

The correct crosswind landing technique in the DA40 is to establish a crab angle into the wind early (4 miles out or earlier) and maintain it through the descent. At 20 ft AGL, begin to straighten the fuselage with rudder while keeping the upwind wing slightly low (crosswind landing attitude). Waiting until short final to apply crosswind correction is too late — the correction becomes reactive, not proactive, and the approach becomes unstable. Early correction, maintained through descent, is the key.

The DA40 is slippery and floats in ground effect — energy management is critical.

The DA40's composite airframe and efficient design make it a slippery airplane. In ground effect, it floats — it does not want to land. Approach speed is 70 KIAS (Vref). Maintain this speed through the descent. Do not allow the airplane to slow below Vref on approach, or it will float even more. Do not allow it to accelerate above Vref, or the landing distance will increase. Precise energy management is the key to a stable approach and a smooth touchdown.

If the approach is unstable below 200 ft AGL, go around immediately — do not attempt recovery on the runway.

An unstable approach is one in which the airplane is not on the centerline, not on speed, not on descent rate, or not in the correct landing attitude. If any of these conditions exist below 200 ft AGL, the correct decision is to go around. Do not attempt to correct the approach by aggressive maneuvering on short final — that is how runway excursions happen. Go around, climb to 1,000 ft, and set up for another approach. A go-around is not a failure; it is airmanship.

Maintain directional control through the entire rollout — do not relax the crosswind correction until the airplane is slow.

After touchdown, the airplane is still moving at 60+ KIAS. The wind is still pushing it. Maintain the crosswind correction (upwind wing low, opposite rudder) through the rollout. As the airplane decelerates below 30 KIAS, the wind effect diminishes and the correction can be relaxed. But until then, active directional control is required. A gust during rollout can push the airplane off the centerline if the correction is not maintained.

At KTPF, the off-field environment is consequential: dense development off the approach end, open water off the departure end.

KTPF is a short field (3,583 ft) in a tight urban environment. Off Runway 22's approach end (heading 037°) is dense development — a runway excursion there could mean impact with a structure. Off Runway 22's departure end (heading 217°) is open water — Tampa Bay. An engine-out or loss of control off that end is a ditching. The field's dominant accident pattern includes LOSS_OF_CONTROL_GROUND (11.1%) and DITCHING (11.1%). Crosswind landings at KTPF demand precision and early decision-making.

Built from the real accident record

Scenario built from NTSB ERA21LA039 (2020 DA40 loss of directional control / runway excursion during landing bounce), GAA19CA582 (2019 DA40 aborted go-around / runway excursion), GAA19CA038 (2018 DA40 excessive landing speed / runway excursion), and regional crosswind-loss-of-control precedents GAA17CA105, CHI02TA149, GAA17CA021, ERA11CA212. Localized to KTPF.

NTSB reports: ERA21LA039 · GAA19CA582 · GAA19CA038 · GAA17CA105 · CHI02TA149 · GAA17CA021 · ERA11CA212

ACS tasks: PA.VII.A — Preflight Inspection · PA.VII.B — Cockpit Management · PA.VIII.A — Takeoff and Climb · PA.VIII.B — Approach and Landing · PA.VIII.C — Go-Around / Rejected Landing · PA.I.H — Human Factors

Relevant FARs: §91.3 · §91.13 · §91.103

Run this scenario yourself

Step through the full decision tree, make the calls, and see where each choice leads — then debrief it with your CFI.

Open the interactive scenario →

All sample scenarios · More Diamond DA40 scenarios · More scenarios at KTPF