FlightEdge
Sample scenario-based training
SAMPLE SBTTakeoff / Initial Climb

Rough Climb Over Tampa Bay

Carburetor ice, partial power loss, and a field surrounded by water — the decision clock is measured in seconds

Cessna 150M · Peter O Knight Airport (KTPF) · Private · Takeoff / Initial Climb

The scenario

Departing Peter O Knight Airport (KTPF), Tampa, FL — Runway 04, climbing out on a 037° heading. Elevation 8 ft MSL; the runway is essentially at sea level. This is a non-towered field (CTAF 122.8); you are in Class G airspace below 1,200 ft MSL, overlain by Tampa Class B above that altitude.

It is a hazy Florida afternoon in late spring: OAT 27°C, dew point 21°C, altimeter 29.92. Scattered clouds at 2,500 ft, light rain shower two miles to the northeast. Visibility 8 SM. Classic Gulf Coast conditions — warm, moist, and exactly the environment the FAA icing probability chart marks as 'serious icing at glide power, moderate icing at cruise power.' The relative humidity is 72%.

You are 350 ft AGL, climbing through 68 KIAS (Vy, best rate of climb for the C150M at sea level), heading 037°, when the engine begins to run rough. Power is noticeably down — the tachometer is dropping. The water of Tampa Bay and Hillsborough Bay fills the windscreen ahead. Off Runway 04's climb-out end, the off-field environment is dense development, medium development, and low-density development — not ideal, but land is there. Off Runway 22 (the reciprocal), the environment is open water — a ditching.

Aircraft: Cessna 150M, solo, full fuel (18 gallons usable), within limits. Carbureted Continental O-200-A, 100 hp, fixed-pitch prop, steam panel, fuel selector on BOTH. Nothing was written up; the airplane was airworthy at departure. The C150 is marginal on climb at gross weight in heat and high density altitude; you are at the edge of performance.

Pilot: you — a Private pilot, current, roughly 180 hours total. You did not apply carburetor heat during the run-up because the engine ran smoothly. You did not apply it after takeoff because you were heads-down on the climb and the engine sounded normal at first.

The decision

Before we get into the decision tree — what do you already know about carburetor ice in the C150M? (Pick all that apply; this records your baseline.)

What the record shows

What the NTSB files show

NTSB ERA25LA028 (2024): A Cessna 150H encountered carburetor ice at cruise altitude in conditions with 100% relative humidity. The engine ran rough and lost power. The probable cause was carburetor ice formation in conditions conducive to serious icing, with insufficient time and altitude for carburetor heat to clear the accumulated ice. The pilot had not applied carburetor heat proactively in conditions that clearly warranted it.

NTSB ANC25LA005 (2024): A Cessna 150 on a personal flight experienced partial engine power loss due to carburetor ice during initial climb in conditions with 70% relative humidity conducive to serious icing at glide power. The pilot applied carburetor heat but did so improperly — partial heat rather than full on — which worsened the situation. The probable cause was improper use of carburetor heat while operating on Mogas in icing conditions.

NTSB ERA24LA087 (2024): A Cessna 150M on a solo cross-country instructional flight experienced partial engine power loss due to carburetor icing when the student pilot failed to apply carburetor heat. The pilot made a diversionary landing but failed to attain a proper touchdown point, resulting in a runway excursion. The probable cause was the pilot's failure to use carburetor heat in icing conditions.

NTSB CEN21LA381 (2021): A Cessna 150M experienced partial engine power loss due to carburetor icing during takeoff near Wadsworth, Ohio, when the pilot failed to apply carburetor heat despite conditions in the moderate-to-serious icing range. The pilot made a forced landing to a corn field where the aircraft nosed over. The pilot survived.

NTSB CEN23FA401 (2023, FATAL): A Cessna 150K on an instructional flight practicing touch-and-go landings experienced partial engine power loss due to fuel system blockage and subsequently stalled during a descending left turn at low altitude. The flight instructor failed to maintain adequate airspeed after the power loss, and the airplane exceeded its critical angle of attack and entered an aerodynamic stall. The accident was fatal.

NTSB CEN23FA077 (2023, FATAL): A Cessna 150H on an instructional flight conducted a night visual approach to a non-towered airport in dark conditions with no cultural lighting. The aircraft descended below safe altitude and impacted a farm field 1.2 miles short of the runway. The probable cause was loss of engine power due to carburetor icing and the flight instructor's failure to apply carburetor heat and maintain control during the forced landing in dark night conditions. The accident was fatal.

The real accidents cited above occurred at other airports and in other regions — NOT at Peter O Knight Airport. KTPF has its own accident history (see field dominant patterns: FORCED_LANDING 19.4%, LOSS_OF_CONTROL_INFLIGHT 16.7%, DITCHING 11.1%), but these specific events happened elsewhere. The scenario is localized to KTPF to make the off-field environment real and consequential for you as a student here.

The consistent thread across all these events: carburetor ice in the C150 is insidious. It builds gradually, the first symptom is roughness and a dropping tachometer (not a dramatic power cut), and by the time it is obvious, it may be too late for a comfortable recovery. The fix — full carburetor heat, immediately, at the first sign of roughness in conducive conditions — is simple. The failure is always a delay.

Key lesson — In warm, moist Gulf Coast air, the C150M's carbureted Continental O-200-A can accumulate serious carburetor ice even at cruise power and above-freezing temperatures. Apply full carburetor heat at the first sign of engine roughness or unexplained RPM loss. At low altitude over water, the decision window is measured in seconds — not minutes. Off Runway 04 at KTPF, the off-field environment is dense development; off Runway 22, it is open water: a delayed response off Runway 22 means a ditching, not a field landing.

Debrief — teaching points

Carburetor ice forms in conditions you would not expect.

The FAA icing probability chart shows 'serious icing at glide power' at temperatures between roughly 20°C and 30°C when relative humidity is high — exactly the Gulf Coast afternoon conditions at KTPF. You do not need visible ice, freezing temperatures, or IMC. Warm, moist air at reduced power is the classic carb-ice environment. The C150M's Continental O-200-A is carbureted; it has no alternate air system. Carburetor heat is the only tool.

The first symptom is subtle — a dropping tachometer and engine roughness.

In a fixed-pitch airplane like the C150M, carburetor ice first shows as engine roughness and an unexplained RPM decrease. There is no dramatic power cut. Pilots who are not actively monitoring the tachometer miss the early warning. By the time the roughness is obvious, significant ice has accumulated. Scan the tachometer as part of your regular instrument scan, especially in conducive conditions.

Apply full carburetor heat — not partial — and expect an initial RPM drop.

When you apply carb heat to an iced carburetor, the RPM will drop further before it rises. This is expected and normal: the heat is melting ice and the resulting water is briefly disrupting combustion. Do not remove carb heat when the RPM drops — that is the heat working. Hold it full on. The RPM will recover as the ice clears, typically within 15–30 seconds depending on ice accumulation. Partial carb heat can worsen the situation by partially melting ice into water ingestion without fully clearing the restriction.

At KTPF, runway selection matters — Runway 22 departure is open water.

The off-field environment off Runway 22's climb-out end (heading 217°) is open water — Tampa Bay and Hillsborough Bay. Off Runway 04 (heading 037°), the environment is dense development. If the engine quits on a Runway 22 departure and altitude is insufficient to return to the airport, the outcome is a ditching. This is not a worst-case scenario; it is the geographic reality. Best glide is 60 KIAS. Doors unlatched before water contact. Master off just before impact. Flaps for slowest possible touchdown speed — impact energy rises with the square of touchdown speed, so the slowest possible speed matters most. Know this before you line up on Runway 22.

Proactive carb heat use in conducive conditions is not optional.

The C150M POH and the FAA Pilot's Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge both recommend applying carburetor heat when conditions are conducive to icing — before the symptom appears. In a Gulf Coast summer departure, with OAT near 27°C and dew point near 21°C, that means applying carb heat during the run-up check (and confirming the expected RPM drop, then recovery) and considering its use during climb in visible moisture or high humidity. Waiting for the roughness to appear at 350 ft AGL over Tampa Bay is waiting too long.

Built from the real accident record

Scenario built from NTSB ERA25LA028 (2024 C150H carburetor ice / delayed carb heat), ANC25LA005 (2024 C150 partial power loss / improper carb heat use), ERA24LA087 (2024 C150M student pilot / failure to use carb heat), WPR21LA329 (2021 C150D engine surge / delayed carb heat), CEN21LA381 (2021 C150M takeoff carb ice / forced landing), ERA21LA284 (2021 C150 takeoff power loss / trees), CEN23FA401 (2023 C150K fuel starvation / stall at low altitude), and CEN23FA077 (2023 C150H night approach / carb ice / loss of control). Anonymized and localized to KTPF.

NTSB reports: ERA25LA028 · ANC25LA005 · ERA24LA087 · WPR21LA329 · CEN21LA381 · ERA21LA284 · CEN23FA401 · CEN23FA077

ACS tasks: PA.I.F — Weather Information · PA.I.G — Cross-Country Flight Planning · PA.IX.C — Emergency Approach and Landing · PA.I.H — Human Factors · PA.II.B — Engine Starting / Systems Preflight

Relevant FARs: §91.3 · §91.13 · §91.185

Run this scenario yourself

Step through the full decision tree, make the calls, and see where each choice leads — then debrief it with your CFI.

Open the interactive scenario →

All sample scenarios · More Cessna 150M scenarios · More scenarios at KTPF