Bouncing Back at Venice
Unstabilized approach, delayed go-around decision, and a gust that the Cherokee 180 cannot recover from — low-altitude loss of control
The scenario
Departing Venice Municipal Airport (KVNC), Venice, FL — Runway 22, a 5,000-foot asphalt runway on a heading of 225° true. Field elevation 18 ft MSL. You are on a local solo flight, practicing landings in variable wind conditions.
The weather is VFR but gusty: winds reported 180° at 12 knots gusting to 22 knots. Runway 22 is roughly aligned with the mean wind direction (180° true), but the gusts are variable — some are nearly direct, some are quartering. Visibility 10 SM, scattered clouds at 3,500 ft, OAT 27°C. KVNC is non-towered (CTAF 122.775); you self-announce all positions and intentions.
You have completed three touch-and-go landings on Runway 22. The first two were stable and smooth. On the third approach, you are at 400 ft AGL on a 3° glide slope when a wind gust lifts the right wing. You correct with left aileron and a touch of left rudder. The approach is now slightly high and drifting left of centerline. You are at 200 ft AGL. The runway is still ahead, but the approach is no longer stable.
Aircraft: Piper Cherokee 180 (PA-28-180), solo, within limits. Carbureted Lycoming O-360-A, fixed-pitch prop, fixed gear, steam panel. Fuel selector on RIGHT tank (you switched from LEFT on the second go-around). Nothing was written up; the airplane is airworthy.
Pilot: you — a Private pilot, current, roughly 180 hours total. You have 12 hours in the Cherokee 180 and are comfortable with the airplane's handling. You have not practiced go-arounds in gusty crosswind conditions. Today's wind is the strongest you have flown in this airplane.
- {'label': 'Field', 'value': 'KVNC · Venice'}
- {'label': 'Runways', 'value': '4/22 · 13/31'}
- {'label': 'Elevation', 'value': '18 ft'}
- {'label': 'Aircraft', 'value': 'PA-28-180'}
- {'label': 'Dominant phase', 'value': 'Landing / Takeoff'}
The decision
Before we get into the decision tree — what do you know about go-arounds in gusty crosswind conditions in the PA-28-180? (Pick all that apply; this records your baseline.)
What the record shows
What the NTSB files show
NTSB WPR25LA275 (2025): A Piper PA-28-180 on a personal flight experienced a delayed go-around from an unstabilized approach with inadequate airspeed. The pilot continued the approach despite high and drifting conditions, resulting in a hard landing, bounce, and nose-over on a dirt mound. The probable cause was the pilot's delayed go-around decision from an unstabilized approach.
NTSB CEN24LA323 (2024): A Piper PA-28 flown by a student pilot on a solo cross-country flight drifted left of the runway centerline on final approach and struck a fence during an attempted go-around. The probable cause was the pilot's failure to maintain directional control during the approach and subsequent go-around.
NTSB CEN21LA291 (2021): A Piper PA-28-180 on an instructional flight encountered a strong right-to-left wind gust during landing approach. The instructor initiated a go-around but failed to maintain control, and the left wing struck the ground. The probable cause was the flight instructor's failure to maintain aircraft control during the landing flare and subsequent attempted go-around with a strong quartering crosswind.
NTSB CEN13CA247 (2013): A Piper PA-28-180 on an instructional flight experienced loss of directional control during a go-around from an aborted landing. The probable cause was the pilot's loss of directional control during an aborted landing.
Regional precedents show a consistent pattern: NTSB ATL07CA048 (Mooney stall during go-around at 20–30 ft AGL), CEN09CA459 (Cessna 172 stall in gusty go-around), GAA17CA103 (PA-28-140 wing strike during crosswind go-around), and GAA17CA513 (Cessna 172 stall in gusting crosswind go-around). All involved low-altitude go-arounds in gusty or crosswind conditions with inadequate airspeed management.
The real accidents cited above occurred at other airports and in various aircraft — NOT at Venice Municipal Airport. KVNC has its own accident history (dominant patterns: loss of control inflight 24.4%, forced landing 12.2%, spatial disorientation 12.2%, hard landing 12.2%, loss of control ground 12.2%), but these specific PA-28-180 go-around accidents happened elsewhere. The scenario is localized to KVNC to make the wind conditions and runway environment real for you as a student here.
The consistent thread across all these events: an unstable approach combined with a delayed go-around decision, followed by loss of control during the go-around in gusty or crosswind conditions. The PA-28-180 has a demonstrated crosswind limit of roughly 12 knots. Gusts beyond that exceed the airplane's control authority. The fix is early recognition of an unstable approach and an immediate go-around decision, followed by correct go-around technique: full power, shallow climb pitch, airspeed priority, and gradual flap retraction.
Key lesson — An unstable approach at low altitude in gusty conditions is the setup for a go-around accident. Recognize the instability early — high, drifting, inadequate airspeed — and go around before you are too low and slow to recover safely. During go-around, apply full power, hold a shallow climb pitch (5–8°), allow airspeed to build to 80+ KIAS before retracting flaps, and retract flaps gradually (10° at a time) to avoid sudden pitch changes. Maintain directional control with coordinated aileron and rudder. If a gust exceeds your control authority, reduce pitch to allow airspeed to build and regain control. At KVNC, wind gusts of 22 knots exceed the PA-28-180's demonstrated crosswind limit — recognize when conditions exceed your airplane's capability and make conservative decisions.
Debrief — teaching points
An unstable approach is the precursor to a go-around accident.
An unstable approach — high, drifting, inadequate airspeed, or unsettled by wind gusts — is the most common precursor to a go-around accident. The PA-28-180 is a stable, forgiving airplane, but it cannot compensate for a pilot who continues an unstable approach too far. Recognize the instability early: if you are high, drifting, or below target airspeed at 300 ft AGL, go around. The cost of a go-around is a few minutes and a little fuel. The cost of continuing an unstable approach is a hard landing, a bounce, or a loss-of-control accident.
The go-around decision must be made early, before the airplane is too low and slow to recover safely.
The decision window for a safe go-around closes rapidly as altitude decreases. At 300 ft AGL, you have options. At 150 ft AGL, your options are limited. At 50 ft AGL, a go-around is high-risk and a hard landing may be inevitable. Make the go-around decision early, when you have altitude and airspeed to work with. A go-around from 300 ft AGL is safe and routine. A go-around from 50 ft AGL is a desperate maneuver.
During go-around, apply full power FIRST and allow airspeed to build before establishing climb pitch.
The correct go-around technique in the PA-28-180 is: (1) apply full power immediately, (2) hold a shallow climb pitch (5–8°) to allow airspeed to build, (3) once airspeed reaches 80+ KIAS, begin gradual flap retraction (10° at a time), and (4) establish a safe climb to pattern altitude. Do NOT pitch up aggressively — an aggressive pitch-up at low airspeed will lead to a stall. The airspeed must build first; the climb attitude is secondary.
Flaps must be retracted gradually during go-around, not all at once.
Retracting flaps from 40° to 0° in one motion causes a sudden loss of lift and a pitch-down moment. The pilot often responds by pulling back on the yoke, which increases the angle of attack and can lead to a stall. The correct technique is to retract flaps 10° at a time, pausing between increments to allow the airplane to stabilize. This gradual approach prevents sudden pitch changes and maintains airspeed.
The PA-28-180 has a demonstrated crosswind limit of roughly 12 knots; gusts beyond that exceed the airplane's control authority.
The PA-28-180 POH lists a demonstrated crosswind limit of approximately 12 knots. At KVNC, the reported wind was 180° at 12 gusting to 22 knots. The gusts of 22 knots exceed the airplane's demonstrated capability. When wind gusts exceed your airplane's demonstrated limit, recognize that the airplane may not be controllable in those conditions. Make a conservative decision: divert to a runway with better wind alignment, delay the flight, or land at a different airport.
Maintain directional control during go-around with coordinated aileron and rudder.
During go-around in gusty conditions, wind gusts can lift a wing and cause a roll. Correct with aileron, but coordinate with rudder to prevent a slip or skid. If a gust is strong enough that aileron alone cannot control the roll, apply rudder to help stop the roll. Maintain coordination throughout the go-around. A loss of directional control during go-around at low altitude is a wing-strike accident.
Built from the real accident record
Scenario built from NTSB WPR25LA275 (2025 PA-28-180 delayed go-around / hard landing / nose-over), CEN24LA323 (2024 PA-28 directional control loss during go-around), CEN21LA291 (2021 PA-28-180 loss of control in crosswind go-around), and CEN13CA247 (2013 PA-28-180 loss of directional control during aborted landing). Regional precedents: ATL07CA048 (Mooney stall during go-around), CEN09CA459 (Cessna 172 stall in gusty go-around), GAA17CA103 (PA-28-140 crosswind go-around loss of control), GAA17CA513 (Cessna 172 stall in gusting crosswind go-around). Localized to KVNC.
NTSB reports: WPR25LA275 · CEN24LA323 · CEN21LA291 · CEN13CA247 · ATL07CA048 · CEN09CA459 · GAA17CA103 · GAA17CA513
ACS tasks: PA.I.F — Weather Information · PA.II.C — Takeoff and Departure · PA.III.A — Normal Approach and Landing · PA.III.B — Forward Slip to a Landing · PA.III.C — Go-Around / Rejected Landing · PA.I.H — Human Factors
Relevant FARs: §91.3 · §91.13 · §91.103
Step through the full decision tree, make the calls, and see where each choice leads — then debrief it with your CFI.
Open the interactive scenario →All sample scenarios · More Piper Cherokee 180 scenarios · More scenarios at KVNC