Bounced Landing, Gusty Wind, and the Go-Around Trap
Loss of control during a low-airspeed go-around in crosswind gusts — the DA40's slippery airframe and constant-speed prop demand precision energy management
The scenario
Departing Zephyrhills Municipal Airport (KZPH), Zephyrhills, FL — Runway 19, on a warm afternoon in late July. Field elevation 90 ft MSL. You are a commercial pilot with roughly 450 hours total time, current and proficient in the DA40. This is a local instructional flight with a student pilot in the right seat.
Weather: OAT 34°C, dew point 24°C, altimeter 29.89. Density altitude approximately 2,100 ft — well above field elevation. Winds are from 200° at 12 knots, gusting to 18 knots. That is a direct crosswind to Runway 19 (true heading 180°) — roughly 12 knots crosswind component, gusting to 18. Visibility 10 SM, scattered clouds at 3,500 ft AGL. Classic Florida summer thermal activity — the kind of day where the air is choppy and the wind is variable.
You are on approach to Runway 19 (5,072 ft, asphalt). The student is flying the airplane under your instruction. On short final, the student has the airplane set up at 70 KIAS (Vref), flaps 20° (landing configuration), power at idle, descent rate 300 ft/min. The runway is made. The landing looks stable.
At 20 feet AGL, a gust lifts the right wing. The student corrects with left aileron and a touch of left rudder. The airplane drifts left of centerline. At 10 feet AGL, the student over-corrects with right aileron. The airplane bounces — a firm landing, then becomes airborne again at 8 feet AGL, still left of centerline. The student is now 15 feet AGL, airborne, with flaps 20° and the airplane drifting left.
Aircraft: Diamond DA40, single-pilot capable, full fuel, within limits. Constant-speed prop (RPM management required), fuel-injected Lycoming IO-360-M1A, fixed gear, G1000 glass panel. Fuel selector is LEFT (the right tank is full; the left tank is full). The student has not yet made a decision: go around or try to land again.
Your role: You are the instructor. The student is flying. You have a few seconds to decide whether to take control, call for a go-around, or let the student attempt another landing. The decision you make — and how you execute it — will determine the outcome.
- {'label': 'Field', 'value': 'KZPH · Zephyrhills'}
- {'label': 'Runways', 'value': '19/1 · 5/23'}
- {'label': 'Elevation', 'value': '90 ft'}
- {'label': 'Aircraft', 'value': 'DA40'}
- {'label': 'Dominant phase', 'value': 'Landing / Cruise'}
The decision
Before we enter the decision tree — what do you know about go-around procedures in the DA40 and loss-of-control risk in gusty crosswind conditions? (Pick all that apply.)
What the record shows
What the NTSB files show
NTSB GAA19CA582 (2019): A Diamond DA40 on an instructional flight experienced a loss of control during an aborted go-around when the pilot cut power and applied brakes with insufficient runway remaining. The accident resulted from the pilot's decision to abort the go-around without adequate runway distance and his failure to accurately communicate his intentions to air traffic control. The probable cause was the pilot's poor decision-making and inadequate runway planning.
NTSB GAA19CA409 (2019): A Diamond DA40 on an instructional flight drifted left of the runway during landing in crosswind conditions and struck a runway edge light during a go-around. The accident resulted from the pilot's failure to maintain runway heading and bank control in crosswind conditions. The lesson: crosswind gusts demand active, smooth control inputs. Over-correction is the trap.
NTSB GAA19CA431 (2019): A Diamond DA40 stalled during a go-around attempt on a short grass runway in high-density altitude conditions after the pilot delayed the go-around decision and the aircraft floated. The accident resulted from the pilot's delayed decision to go around in high-temperature and high-density altitude conditions and his exceedance of the airplane's critical angle of attack. The probable cause: failure to recognize an unstable approach and delayed go-around decision.
NTSB ATL07CA048 (2007, Mooney M20J): A stall during a go-around at 20–30 feet AGL with landing gear and flaps extended. The pilot failed to maintain airspeed during the go-around. The lesson: recognize when a go-around is necessary, commit to proper flap/gear retraction sequence, and maintain airspeed priority over terrain avoidance.
NTSB ERA20CA072 (2020, Beech C23): A bounced landing in crosswind conditions became airborne, and the airplane entered a full stall during the go-around despite full power and flaps. The flight instructor's delayed intervention allowed the stall to develop. The lesson: recognize full-stall entry during go-around in gusty conditions; understand that full power alone is insufficient if pitch attitude is too high; intervene early.
NTSB CEN09CA459 (2009, Cessna 172P): A floated landing in gusty winds led to a go-around stall at low altitude when the pilot set climb pitch attitude without maintaining adequate airspeed. The lesson: during go-around in gusty conditions, prioritize airspeed over climb pitch; retract flaps gradually while maintaining safe airspeed.
NTSB GAA16CA106 (2016, Piper PA-28RT): A stall during a go-around at 50 feet AGL in gusting crosswind conditions. The probable cause: the student pilot's exceedance of the aircraft's critical angle-of-attack during the go-around. The lesson: avoid simultaneous aggressive pitch-up and power application; establish positive rate of climb with level or slightly nose-up pitch before increasing pitch attitude.
The real accidents cited above occurred at other airports and in other aircraft — NOT at KZPH. However, KZPH's own accident corpus shows FORCED_LANDING (29.2%), LOSS_OF_CONTROL_INFLIGHT (29.2%), and STALL_SPIN (16.7%) as dominant patterns. Gusty crosswind conditions at KZPH are common in summer thermal activity. The scenario is localized to KZPH to make the off-field environment real and the decision window consequential for you as a student here.
The consistent thread across all these events: a bounced landing or unstable approach triggers a go-around decision. The go-around itself is where the loss of control occurs. The trap is always the same: the pilot increases pitch attitude without first establishing positive rate of climb and safe airspeed. In the DA40, the constant-speed prop adds a layer of complexity — the prop control must be advanced to full RPM, not just the throttle. Flaps must be retracted gradually. Airspeed is the priority. Pitch attitude is secondary.
Key lesson — A bounced landing in gusty crosswind conditions at KZPH demands an immediate, procedurally correct go-around. In the DA40, that means: (1) full power — throttle AND prop control to full RPM; (2) flaps to 10° (gradual reduction, not all at once); (3) establish positive rate of climb and airspeed at or above Vy (66 KIAS) before increasing pitch attitude; (4) retract flaps fully only after positive rate of climb is confirmed. The constant-speed prop requires active management. Flap retraction must be gradual. Airspeed is the priority; pitch attitude is secondary. At low altitude in gusty conditions, the margin between a safe go-around and a stall is measured in seconds and knots. Recognize an unstable approach early. Commit to the go-around. Execute it procedurally. Do not delay.
Debrief — teaching points
Recognize an unstable approach early and commit to the go-around before the bounce.
A bounced landing is a clear signal that the approach was unstable. Crosswind gusts, high descent rate, or drift from centerline are warning signs. The decision to go around should be made BEFORE the bounce, not after. If the approach is unstable at 500 feet AGL, go around then — not at 20 feet AGL after the bounce. At 20 feet AGL, the go-around is a recovery from an emergency, not a planned maneuver. The margin is thin. In the DA40, recognize instability early and commit to the go-around while you still have altitude and airspeed.
The DA40's constant-speed prop requires active management — throttle alone is insufficient.
In the DA40, full power means advancing BOTH the throttle and the prop control to full RPM. Many pilots advance the throttle but forget the prop control — a common error that results in limited power during a go-around. The prop control is on the left side of the throttle quadrant; it must be pushed forward to full RPM (typically 2,700 RPM). If the prop control is not advanced, the engine is not producing full power, and the go-around climb will be weak. Teach the student to call out 'Throttle full, prop full' during the go-around to ensure both controls are advanced.
Flap retraction during go-around must be gradual, not all at once.
The DA40 is a slippery, efficient airframe. Flap drag is significant. If flaps are retracted all at once (from 20° to 0°), the sudden loss of drag causes the airplane to pitch up abruptly. At low altitude and marginal airspeed, this pitch-up can induce a stall. The correct procedure is to retract flaps gradually: 20° to 10° (while climbing at Vy), then 10° to 0° (after positive rate of climb is confirmed and airspeed is safe). This gradual retraction allows the pilot to manage the pitch change and maintain airspeed.
Airspeed is the priority during go-around; pitch attitude and climb rate are secondary.
During a go-around, the pilot's focus must be on maintaining airspeed above Vy (66 KIAS in the DA40). Pitch attitude and climb rate are secondary. The correct procedure is: (1) establish full power (throttle and prop); (2) reduce flaps to 10°; (3) hold level or slightly nose-up pitch attitude, allowing airspeed to build to Vy; (4) once positive rate of climb is confirmed and airspeed is safe, increase pitch attitude slightly to climb out. Do NOT increase pitch attitude before airspeed is established. A high pitch attitude at low airspeed is the stall trap.
Crosswind gusts demand smooth, coordinated control inputs — avoid over-correction.
In gusty crosswind conditions, the airplane will drift and the wings will lift. The pilot's response must be smooth and coordinated — small aileron and rudder inputs to correct the drift. Over-correction is the trap: a large aileron input to correct a gust-induced drift can cause the airplane to over-correct in the opposite direction, leading to another gust-induced drift in the new direction. This oscillation can lead to a loss of control. Teach smooth, small inputs. Let the airplane settle. Avoid aggressive corrections.
Off Runway 19 at KZPH, the off-field environment is marginal — mostly open developed areas, parks, and evergreen forest.
If a go-around fails and a forced landing becomes necessary off Runway 19 (heading 180°), the off-field environment is marginal. There are open developed areas and parks, but also evergreen forest. A forced landing in trees is dangerous. This reinforces the importance of a successful go-around: do not allow the go-around to fail. Execute it procedurally, maintain airspeed, and climb out safely. The off-field environment is not a good option.
Built from the real accident record
Scenario built from NTSB GAA19CA582, GAA19CA409, GAA19CA431 (DA40 go-around loss-of-control events), and regional precedents ATL07CA048, ERA20CA072, CEN09CA459, GAA16CA106 (go-around stall/loss-of-control in crosswind/gusty conditions). Anonymized and localized to KZPH.
NTSB reports: GAA19CA582 · GAA19CA409 · GAA19CA431 · ATL07CA048 · ERA20CA072 · CEN09CA459 · GAA16CA106
ACS tasks: PA.V.A — Approach and Landing · PA.V.B — Go-Around / Rejected Landing · PA.I.F — Weather Information · PA.I.H — Human Factors · PA.II.C — Flight Controls
Relevant FARs: §91.3 · §91.13 · §91.21
Step through the full decision tree, make the calls, and see where each choice leads — then debrief it with your CFI.
Open the interactive scenario →All sample scenarios · More Diamond DA40 scenarios · More scenarios at KZPH