Engine Out Over Tampa Development
Total power loss on initial climb from a non-towered field — congested terrain ahead, no good landing site, and a decision window measured in seconds
The scenario
Departing Tampa North Aero Park Airport (X39), Tampa, FL — Runway 14, initial climb on a 141° heading. Elevation 68 ft MSL. Non-towered field (CTAF); you will self-announce on 122.8. Class G airspace below 3,000 ft MSL; above that, you are in the overlying Tampa Class B (3,000–10,000 MSL).
It is a clear morning in early fall: OAT 24°C, dew point 18°C, altimeter 29.96, light and variable winds. Visibility 10 SM. VFR conditions, no weather concerns. You are planning a local flight to a nearby practice area.
Aircraft: Piper PA-28-161 Warrior, solo, full fuel (36 gallons usable), within limits. Lycoming O-320-D carbureted engine, fixed-pitch prop, fixed gear, steam panel. Left and right fuel tanks; fuel selector on LEFT. You completed a full preflight, including fuel quantity check (both tanks visually confirmed full), fuel selector operation (LEFT / RIGHT / OFF tested), and engine start checklist (primer locked, throttle cracked, mixture rich, magnetos both, fuel pump on if equipped — the Warrior has no electric fuel pump).
Pilot: you — a Private pilot, current, roughly 250 hours total. This is your third flight from X39; you are familiar with the field. You have not flown the Warrior before today; this is a checkout flight in a new-to-you aircraft.
Runway 14's off-field environment: the climb-out heading (141°) takes you over medium development, low-density development, and wooded wetland — no open fields, no roads suitable for a forced landing, no water. The terrain is congested. A forced landing off Runway 14 in the first 500 ft AGL is a crash into development, not a field landing.
- {'label': 'Field', 'value': 'X39 · Tampa North Aero Park'}
- {'label': 'Runways', 'value': '14/32'}
- {'label': 'Elevation', 'value': '68 ft'}
- {'label': 'Aircraft', 'value': 'PA-28-161'}
- {'label': 'Dominant phase', 'value': 'Takeoff / Landing'}
The decision
Before we get into the decision tree — what do you know about engine failure on initial climb in a Piper Warrior? (Pick all that apply; this records your baseline.)
What the record shows
What the NTSB files show
NTSB NYC05FA005 (2004): A Piper PA-28-161 lost engine power when the propeller separated due to under-torqued retention bolts during cruise flight. The pilot declared a mayday and attempted a forced landing in a field but struck a residential house, fatally injuring both occupants. The probable cause was inadequate maintenance — the retention bolts were not torqued to specification during a recent propeller overhaul.
NTSB CEN22LA324 (2022): A Piper PA-28-161 on a personal flight experienced total engine power loss due to fuel exhaustion. The student pilot made a forced landing on an interstate roadway. The accident resulted from fuel exhaustion; the student pilot was operating the aircraft while intoxicated and did not manage fuel properly. This is a human-factors accident, not a mechanical failure.
NTSB ERA21LA267 (2021): A Piper PA-28-161 lost all engine power during the student pilot's first solo flight while turning onto downwind at 700 feet AGL. The aircraft stalled during the forced landing approach and impacted a construction area. The reason for engine power loss could not be determined due to post-crash fire damage. The probable cause was a total loss of engine power for undetermined reasons, with a contributing factor being the stall during the forced landing approach.
NTSB ERA21LA213 (2021): A Piper PA-28-161 on a cross-country flight experienced engine roughness at 5,500 feet followed by total loss of power. The student pilot made a forced landing in a field. Post-accident examination and engine test run revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions. The probable cause was a total loss of engine power for reasons that could not be determined based on available information.
NTSB ATL90LA140 (1990, Beech C24R): Engine failure during initial climb; forced landing in a soybean field. The pilot struck an unseen ditch during the landing roll. The accident resulted from engine malfunction for undetermined reasons, with a contributing factor being the unseen ditch. The lesson: commit decisively to the best available landing site rather than attempting to stretch glide or turn back toward congested area.
NTSB MIA91LA214 (1991, Ryan Navion): Engine failure shortly after takeoff; forced landing that struck a tree and ground. The accident resulted from undetermined engine failure; the pilot did not follow the operating checklist requirement to use the electric fuel boost pump. The lesson: follow engine-start and takeoff checklists completely to avoid preventable power loss during initial climb.
NTSB WPR18FA046 (2017, Beech A36): Total engine power loss approximately 1.5 nm west of the departure airport; forced landing in a schoolyard, striking a residence. The accident resulted from a total loss of engine power for reasons that could not be determined. The lesson: when engine fails over congested terrain shortly after takeoff, commit to the least-bad landing site immediately rather than attempting to stretch glide or turn back toward airport.
NTSB LAX88LA050 (1987, Cessna 150): Engine rough running and power loss during initial climb after takeoff; forced landing on a street, striking street signs and curbing. The accident resulted from an unlocked engine primer causing power loss during the initial climb phase. The lesson: thorough preflight inspection and strict adherence to engine-start checklist (including primer lock) prevent power loss during initial climb and expand available landing options.
The real accidents cited above occurred at other airports and in other aircraft — NOT at Tampa North Aero Park (X39). X39 has its own accident history (see field dominant patterns: LOSS_OF_CONTROL_INFLIGHT 27.3%, LOSS_OF_CONTROL_GROUND 18.2%), but these specific NTSB events happened elsewhere. The scenario is localized to X39 and the PA-28-161 to make the off-field environment real and consequential for you as a student here.
The consistent thread across all these events: engine failure on initial climb over congested terrain is survivable if you establish best glide immediately, commit decisively to the best available landing site, and fly the airplane all the way to touchdown. The failures are always a delay in decision-making, an attempt to turn back to the airport at low altitude, or a stall during the forced landing approach.
Key lesson — Engine failure on initial climb from X39 Runway 14 is over congested development with no open field for a forced landing. The decision window is 60–90 seconds. Establish best glide (73 KIAS) immediately, scan ahead for the least-bad landing site (a street, a parking lot, a gap), and commit to it decisively. Do not attempt to turn back to the runway at low altitude, do not try to stretch the glide, and do not stall. Fly the airplane all the way to touchdown at best glide speed. Survivability depends on your decision-making in the first 30 seconds after power loss.
Debrief — teaching points
Best glide speed in the PA-28-161 is 73 KIAS — establish it immediately after power loss.
The moment the engine fails, lower the nose to 73 KIAS and trim for hands-off flight. This is the speed that maximizes glide distance and gives you the most time to assess options and commit to a landing site. At 400 ft AGL on initial climb, you have roughly 60–90 seconds of glide time at 73 KIAS. Do not raise the nose above best glide to stretch the glide — that will cause a stall at low altitude. Do not descend faster than best glide — that wastes altitude. 73 KIAS is the only speed that matters.
Off Runway 14 at X39, the climb-out environment is congested development — there is no open field.
The USGS NLCD ground cover off Runway 14's departure end (heading 141°) is medium development, low-density development, and wooded wetland. There are no open fields, no roads suitable for a forced landing, no water. A forced landing off Runway 14 in the first 500 ft AGL is a crash into development, not a field landing. Know this before you line up on Runway 14. If the engine fails on initial climb, your options are limited: a street, a parking lot, a small gap in the trees. Commit to the best available site within your glide distance.
Do not attempt to turn back to the runway at low altitude after engine failure.
At 400 ft AGL on initial climb, a 180° turn back to Runway 14 requires altitude and control authority you do not have with no engine power. The airspeed will decay, the turn will become steep, and you will lose control. The 'impossible turn' is a real phenomenon: at low altitude with no engine power, the geometry does not work. Commit to the best landing site ahead in your current heading, not behind you.
The Warrior's LEFT / RIGHT fuel selector with no BOTH position means fuel management is the pilot's job.
Unlike some aircraft with a BOTH position, the Warrior requires you to actively manage the fuel selector. Fuel starvation from not switching tanks, or from selecting an empty tank, is a real risk. During preflight, verify both tanks are full — dip stick, not just visual. During the flight, plan to switch tanks on initial climb (even if both are full, switching confirms both are working). If one tank is empty or nearly empty, you will discover it on initial climb, not at cruise altitude.
Thorough preflight fuel check — dip stick, not just visual — prevents fuel-starvation engine failures.
The Warrior's fuel sight gauges are the standard way to check fuel quantity, but they are not foolproof. A sight gauge can be misleading in certain light, or the tank can have a slow leak. The only way to be certain is to dip both tanks with a fuel stick and verify the exact quantity. This takes 5 minutes and is non-negotiable. If you do not dip the tanks, you are gambling with your life.
Commit decisively to a landing site — do not attempt marginal options at low altitude.
When you spot a potential landing site (a street, a parking lot, a gap in the trees), assess it quickly: can you actually land there? Is it long enough? Are there obstacles? If the answer is yes, commit to it. If the answer is no or maybe, keep looking. Do not attempt a marginal landing site at 200 ft AGL with no engine power — the margin for error is zero. The best landing site is the one you can actually reach and land in safely.
Built from the real accident record
Scenario inspired by NTSB NYC05FA005 (2004, PA-28-161 propeller separation), CEN22LA324 (2022, PA-28-161 fuel exhaustion), ERA21LA267 (2021, PA-28-161 engine-out on first solo), ERA21LA213 (2021, PA-28-161 undetermined power loss), and regional precedents ATL90LA140 (1990, Beech engine failure over soybean field), MIA91LA214 (1991, Ryan Navion fuel-pump omission), WPR18FA046 (2017, Beech A36 engine-out over schoolyard), LAX88LA050 (1987, Cessna 150 primer-lock power loss). Real events occurred at other airports and aircraft — NOT at Tampa North Aero Park. Localized to X39 and the PA-28-161 Warrior.
NTSB reports: NYC05FA005 · CEN22LA324 · ERA21LA267 · ERA21LA213 · ATL90LA140 · MIA91LA214 · WPR18FA046 · LAX88LA050
ACS tasks: PA.I.F — Weather Information · PA.I.G — Cross-Country Flight Planning · PA.IX.C — Emergency Approach and Landing · PA.I.H — Human Factors · PA.II.B — Engine Starting / Systems Preflight · PA.II.C — Takeoff and Climb
Relevant FARs: §91.3 · §91.13 · §91.185
Step through the full decision tree, make the calls, and see where each choice leads — then debrief it with your CFI.
Open the interactive scenario →All sample scenarios · More Piper Warrior scenarios · More scenarios at X39